Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Explain to me why we didn't get a first down on the personal foul


RumHam

Recommended Posts

I have never seen that before and they really fuged that up. Never has there been a personal foul that takes place on the next play that still resulted in a turnover on downs. Should have been first down us, not them and 15 yards. #pointsshaving

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that was pretty much a text book deadball foul.

From the NFL Rulebook

Quote

Foul After Change of Possession. If there is a foul, including a dead-ball foul, after team possession has changed during a down, following enforcement of a distance penalty, it is first-and-10 for the team that was in possession at the time of the foul.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

No conspiracy. Davis can’t taunt Funchess until after he’s already been stopped. If it was a late hit or face mask we get the first.

Or if it had been a 3rd down play and we were still in possession. As it was a 4th down play possession changed the second the play was whistled dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

No conspiracy. Davis can’t taunt Funchess until after he’s already been stopped. If it was a late hit or face mask we get the first.

Oh, I know. Just sayin'...

Even if we're talking about a genuine blown call here, that's common. Every single team's fanbase can give you examples.

Poor officiating happens... plenty. It doesn't take a concerted effort to screw something up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RumHam said:

I have never seen that before and they really fuged that up. Never has there been a personal foul that takes place on the next play that still resulted in a turnover on downs. Should have been first down us, not them and 15 yards. #pointsshaving

It was a fourth down possession play in which the Panthers did not convert. The penalty was a dead ball foul (occurred after the Panthers did not convert). In other words, possession of the ball switched to Tampa immediately after the failed fourth down play and the penalty occurred after that change of possession.

It was the right call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is wrong with our fan base...

Were you sitting there scratching your head last night too, when Michael Thomas scored the 70 yard touchdown and got the Unsportsmanlike Conduct penalty for using a prop during his celebration? Did you think that negates the touchdown, despite occurring after the play? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, people around me at the game were confused about this, but it's because they're thinking of it in terms of "we have possession and this happened right after the play, so we should still have possession."  You have to think of it like we stopped having possession the moment the whistle is blown and the play is dead.  At that point, if we didn't get the first down, then it's immediately Tampa's possession, so anything that happens after that affects their possession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RumHam said:

I have never seen that before and they really fuged that up. Never has there been a personal foul that takes place on the next play that still resulted in a turnover on downs. Should have been first down us, not them and 15 yards. #pointsshaving

It was after the play was over. The result of the play was a turnover. Following the play was a taunting penalty. If a personal foul had been committed during the play, we would've retained possession of the ball. It's the same reason why a personal foul for taunting after a touchdown doesn't bring the ball back out to the position where the offense was, minus 15 years, before the score.

It really isn't that difficult to understand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...