Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther not worried about CMC's high snap count


Johnny Rockets

Recommended Posts

Interesting article from the Observer:

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article221598590.html

McCaffrey doesn’t just lead the league’s top running backs in percentage of snaps played — he’s not even in the same stratosphere as the other nine. He has played 96 percent of Carolina’s snaps this season, and the running back closest to matching that is Dallas’ Ezekiel Elliott, who has played 89 percent of the Cowboys’ snaps.

For Panthers fans worried about McCaffrey’s longevity at his current snap rate, this stat could get you through the night — his usage rate (touches per snaps played) of 32 percent is the second-lowest of any of the NFL’s 10 most-productive running backs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Johnny Rockets said:

Interesting article from the Observer:

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article221598590.html

McCaffrey doesn’t just lead the league’s top running backs in percentage of snaps played — he’s not even in the same stratosphere as the other nine. He has played 96 percent of Carolina’s snaps this season, and the running back closest to matching that is Dallas’ Ezekiel Elliott, who has played 89 percent of the Cowboys’ snaps.

For Panthers fans worried about McCaffrey’s longevity at his current snap rate, this stat could get you through the night — his usage rate (touches per snaps played) of 32 percent is the second-lowest of any of the NFL’s 10 most-productive running backs.

Aka CMC is a chess piece and is highly efficient when his number is called in the play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, countryboi said:

This is not a long term plan, most backs can handle 300 plus touches for maybe 3-4 seasons before their body just completely breaks down

Depends on the player, similar players like Curtis Martin, Tomlinson, Faulk, etc. handled it for a decade plus. And McC isn't taking nearly the beating that more traditional RBs take pounding the ball up the middle. I don't see any reason he can't be a guy who lasts into his 30s as a productive player. Maybe he even transitions to more of a receiver late in his career too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, countryboi said:

This is not a long term plan, most backs can handle 300 plus touches for maybe 3-4 seasons before their body just completely breaks down

um clearly it is b/c Rivera said they were doing this going in despite Hurney signing CJ, then cutting CJ. Also look for Torrey to come back in and eat up that roster spot on Sunday as DJ and Samuel go absent and we wonder what happened after losing 33-12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It shoudn't come as such a shock.  When Turner was in San Diego LT got all of the snaps except a few.  After his first contract, they let one MIchael Turner walk and he came to the Falcons.  Can anybody name the Dallas Cowboys RB behind Emmett Smith?  Norv has always fed the number one back because he is old school like that.  To me, it wasn't a surprise that CJ didn't get hardly any touches.  Norv's number two back has never gotten many touches and once he found out CMAC could take the bulk of the load, CJ became expendable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

It shoudn't come as such a shock.  When Turner was in San Diego LT got all of the snaps except a few.  After his first contract, they let one MIchael Turner walk and he came to the Falcons.  Can anybody name the Dallas Cowboys RB behind Emmett Smith?  Norv has always fed the number one back because he is old school like that.  To me, it wasn't a surprise that CJ didn't get hardly any touches.  Norv's number two back has never gotten many touches and once he found out CMAC could take the bulk of the load, CJ became expendable.  

Norv did have Sproles complementing LT for a time there, and for a 3-4 year stretch Sproles had nearly 10 touches per game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, t96 said:

Norv did have Sproles complementing LT for a time there, and for a 3-4 year stretch Sproles had nearly 10 touches per game...

Yep, you're right.  I forgot about Sproles.  I remember when Ron first got here, he kept saying he wanted a Sproles type back.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, a large % of his snaps feature him as a decoy. He's so versatile that defenses have to honor his presence on the field. 

The Steelers addressed that by forcing him to stay in and protect last week, so that could be a new blueprint for teams to deal with CMC and Norv will have to counter that.

Good news is most teams are not setup to blitz as effectively as the Steelers and with the big lead they had they could afford to continue rolling the dice by sending blitzes to hold our offense in check. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Johnny Rockets said:

Interesting article from the Observer:

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article221598590.html

McCaffrey doesn’t just lead the league’s top running backs in percentage of snaps played — he’s not even in the same stratosphere as the other nine. He has played 96 percent of Carolina’s snaps this season, and the running back closest to matching that is Dallas’ Ezekiel Elliott, who has played 89 percent of the Cowboys’ snaps.

For Panthers fans worried about McCaffrey’s longevity at his current snap rate, this stat could get you through the night — his usage rate (touches per snaps played) of 32 percent is the second-lowest of any of the NFL’s 10 most-productive running backs.

Even if his touches are limited, he is still doing things like blocking.

Also, consider we rely on one guy TOO much, what happens if he is out? We aren't god of personnel and scheming like the Patriots, think it's suffice to say if CMC went down we'd be fuged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
    • we may think we know, but we don't know. we won't know what effect upgrades on the OL, coaching staff, and WR room will have. we don't know what scheme canales is going to put together. we don't know a lot of things.  that's why we play the games...to see what shakes out. plenty of reasons to think Bryce is limited this year...again. Plenty of reasons to see an improvement in his play. 
    • He did not elevate the players around him, but they de-elevated their QB.  A QB like Bryce needs a system, a strong OL, a Running game, and WRs that can get open.  Call him a manager at best, but so is a point guard.  That is all we should need.  He is smart enough to grow into a very effective player.  I once saw a Coach talking about the OL--i forget who it was Schottenheimer comes to mind--and he said, you can succeed if you have one weak link on the OL.  If you get 2 weak links, success comes 10x harder.  If you get three weak links, your season is over.  Your QB is injured, and you are unemployed (paraphrasing).  I would say that we had 4 weak links (Icky does not get a pass) and a RB who was not good at pass blocking. I am not saying the Bryce is the answer at QB--but I am saying we don't know yet. I know QBs (college) and when the OL sucks, they collapse mentally over time.  That is what we saw--a QB who had never played without the advantage.
×
×
  • Create New...