Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CAM is hurt????


Davis83

Recommended Posts

Not a single scramble today - not a single designed run.  One play the entire left side of the field was empty and he never even considered taking off.

 

Could that hit into the shoulder he took last week be more than it seemed?

yes, he threw fairly well at times today - but when do you recall Cam never running at some point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Davis83 said:

Not a single scramble today - not a single designed run.  One play the entire left side of the field was empty and he never even considered taking off.

 

Could that hit into the shoulder he took last week be more than it seemed?

yes, he threw fairly well at times today - but when do you recall Cam never running at some point?

Yea I think something is up but Cam Newton rarely seems to scramble when he should.  The whole "Cam Newton has gotten better at standing in the pocket" annoys me when I hear it from other fans or announcers.  Newton always seems to pass up obvious opportunities to take off and run.

But IMO I've never seen it more blatant than today, which makes me think something is hurting him unless Norv Turner simply has told him not to but that would seem odd.  On that 3rd down he took the sack near the goal-line, he had all day to run to the left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if he is, what in the world do some of you expect? The man consistently puts the team on his back. He had over 300 passing yards and 3 touchdowns. And what does he get for his efforts? His own fans here calling him SCaam Newton. So embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

Even if he is, what in the world do some of you expect? The man consistently puts the team on his back. He had over 300 passing yards and 3 touchdowns. And what does he get for his efforts? His own fans here calling him SCaam Newton. So embarrassing.

WHY WON'T THIS FORUM EVER ALLOW ANYONE TO CRITICIZE Sir Cameron Newton: Leader of Men, Lover of Puppies...Esquire??!?!?!

HUH?!?

CAN YOU TELL ME THAT??!?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i thought his throwing motion was a little different on the first drive.  he wasn't whipping his head, which i thought was great.   balls were right on.  but that is interesting about his shoulder and him not running today.   i thought he played great.   line sucks, d sucks.  he's why rr has a job.  i really believe that. sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

WHY WON'T THIS FORUM EVER ALLOW ANYONE TO CRITICIZE Sir Cameron Newton: Leader of Men, Lover of Puppies...Esquire??!?!?!

HUH?!?

CAN YOU TELL ME THAT??!?!?!

Same reason you can't critique CMC.     :tongue:

 

Come on this forums very transparent no one just never mentions the elephant in the room on game day I blame tinderbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 weeks ago he was running more than he had in several years... they game plan for a reason. Sometimes people here are so clueless. RR didn’t throw Cam under the bus, the ball was high and Wright was wide open. Second worst throw into the endzone I have seen him make. The other one lost us a game too, against the shithawks that bounced at a TEs feet. That play didn’t cost us the game. But a mix of other garbage from the team did, and Newton pointed it out. The garbage defense is killing me... I have to take a break from watching, it’s not any fun. If they were losing games to teams they were worse than, I can tolerate that.. but this is just bad football

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Davis83 said:

Not a single scramble today - not a single designed run.  One play the entire left side of the field was empty and he never even considered taking off.

 

Could that hit into the shoulder he took last week be more than it seemed?

yes, he threw fairly well at times today - but when do you recall Cam never running at some point?

I think this is 100% accurate.  We didn't have one designed run for him.  Put him in very little danger of contact and he didn't scramble on plays he would normally take off on.

If we end up 6-6 in the next two weeks.  I think we shut him done and let our backup run the show.  It gives him some opportunities to get some actual game time experience.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...