Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera evolving


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article225934655.html

Quote

 

Rivera has taken time to evaluate each of his coaches this offseason. They went over every call and every play on both offense and defense, trying to find out what went so very wrong during the Panthers’ seven-game losing streak in 2018.

But Rivera also conducted his own self-evaluation with the help of his wife, Stephanie, over the past month.

 

Stephanie has a coaching background.  Hope her feedback was good...betting on it!

 

Quote

There are some hard truths in a season that started 6-2, and ended 7-9. Rivera remains frustrated that he saw symptoms of the wheels falling off in a blowout in Pittsburgh, but he was too slow to make the correct diagnosis because narrow losses the next two weeks, each essentially decided by one or two plays, clouded his vision.

Hope he has truly learned from this...sounds good.  Make it happen Coach!!

 

Quote

 

So far, that innovation is taking the form of a defense that will will likely be much more multiple than in past years. Rivera wants to marry as many 3-4 and 4-3 defensive concepts as possible, depending on the matchup.

This reflects Rivera’s body of work in Chicago, where he ran a 4-3, and in San Diego, where he ran a 3-4.

But it also puts the Panthers in better position to counter a wide variety of offensive looks and throw more wrinkles in opponents’ paths.

“If you play a 30-front (and) a 40-front, guess what everybody has to prepare for?” he said. “Both. Not just the same thing over and over and over.”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ultimately, Ron should've had a 3-4 hybrid from the get-go, to combat the pass-heavy NFL.  I actually prefer the 4-3, but when you have "poo" DE's (post Greg Hardy and semi-prime CJ), you have to adjust at least occasionally.

To Ron's credit, it seems that his play calling was 20x that of Washington.

I'm confident our D can get back to a dominant force with Keuchly, D Jackson, Bradberry, (hopefully Reid), KK, Poe, and a revamped DE core.

The biggest mistake I see was having Washington cover the D, and then sticking with Adams, who was too old.  All we need is another good safety, and one or two play making DE's.  That truly will be enough.  With a healthy Cam and our new weapons (assuming a couple Oline pieces)... we actually are Super Bowl contenders.  Don't @ me 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I’ll believe it when I see it 

Agreed.   It is exciting that he brings this up but we've heard it before and nothing really came of it.

The statement of offenses having to prepare for both makes it harder for a solid offensive game plan.  That said it also requires defensive players to learn two defenses.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...