Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Contract talks between Panthers, Daryl Williams stall


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Joseph Person of TheAthletic.com reports that the talks have stalled and Williams is expected to hit the open market when the new league year opens on March 13. He’ll be able to start hearing from teams other than the Panthers on March 11.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/03/06/report-contract-talks-between-panthers-daryl-williams-stall/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

067UwKP3_bigger.jpgJourdan RodrigueVerified account @JourdanRodrigue
FollowFollow @JourdanRodrigue
More

Been getting Daryl Williams questions. Since June, and reported at the time, there has been a gap in financial expectations between the club & Williams’ camp & contract talks were stalled. Williams’ extenuating circumstances in 2018 (injury) didn’t bring the 2 sides any closer.

9:55 AM - 6 Mar 2019
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's up to the market now. One crazy offer and he is gone. Hopefully it never comes and we have a shot at a decent but not record book contract. Sounds good about his knee. Regardless of how this shakes down he played hard here and was fun to cheer for when he was plowing into Ds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It's up to the market now. One crazy offer and he is gone. Hopefully it never comes and we have a shot at a decent but not record book contract. Sounds good about his knee. Regardless of how this shakes down he played hard here and was fun to cheer for when he was plowing into Ds.

Per LaCanfora:

The Bills and Giants will be in pursuit of Panthers tackle Daryl Williams, I'm told, and his price has soared above where the Panthers are likely able to match.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2019-nfl-free-agency-safeties-no-longer-forgotten-the-rise-of-the-slot-receiver-and-more-insider-notes/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we were in talks, the knee must have checked out. Props to Hurney for not rolling over and handing DW a blank check, but I really hope we get this one right. I'd hate to see DW walk for a market value starting RT contract if he's healthy.

He's going to get overpaid, so many teams with cap space available. I cringe every time I see a post saying we can't afford this player or trade for that player because they are expensive.

It's like our fans think quality players come cheap. Then after all is said and done and we end up with average FA's they will say "why do we always sign low quality FA's", ugghhh because we are not willing to spend for the big star FA's.

 

Williams will be a top player in this FA market, he will cost a lot. We have to either pay him or somebody else will. It's that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

it's ok. kalil's got this.

imageproxy.php.gif

 

 

There are a LOT of Panthers fans in support of paying this guy an additional $7M this season instead of making him a post-June 1st cut and clearing up $7.25M in cap space. A large chunk of this fanbase has seemingly moved past the point of numbness to watching the Panthers make baffling roster moves and have moved into full on Stockholm Syndrome territory in defending them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...