Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mission this offseason was to fix the trenches..


Sub Zero

Recommended Posts

 

Oline upgrades and pass rush help so far..

With the best trench draft in years coming.. My money is on adding more players to both lines..

I agree with this plan and thought it was needed before the offseason started.. I hope Hurney is able to finish it out without getting side track by some skill position player ..  I like the idea of a hybrid system and I hope they add some young pieces in the draft to make that happen..

What do you guys think so far with this objection in mind??

#year of the trenches..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really pumped about the moves so far. They could always go south on us, like most of last year's free agents did but on paper this is looking like a really great offseason of filling needs at reasonable prices. Even the Reid signing at a price people initially bitched about looks to be better than average once the market for safeties opened up. 

Lets keep the momentum up, though. If we can get a solid veteran at FS and maybe extend someone like Shaq to save some coin, this could be a damn good free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney is going BPA.

all the mocks are crazy. Some have all the OT gone before us and the best pass rushers and leaving corners, safeties or 2nd tier, 2nd round pass rushers we would over draft.

some mocks have the opposite, but run on defensive,... several OT options, safeties etc.

bottom line is few know what’s going to be there at 16 that is worth the best choice so he’s plugging the holes.

BPA,.. could be a great corner or Safety, could be OT, DE, 3/4 OLB or 4-3 OLB—

get the best player,..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JARROD said:

Hurney is going BPA.

all the mocks are crazy. Some have all the OT gone before us and the best pass rushers and leaving corners, safeties or 2nd tier, 2nd round pass rushers we would over draft.

some mocks have the opposite, but run on defensive,... several OT options, safeties etc.

bottom line is few know what’s going to be there at 16 that is worth the best choice so he’s plugging the holes.

BPA,.. could be a great corner or Safety, could be OT, DE, 3/4 OLB or 4-3 OLB—

get the best player,..

That is what I love so much about the way we are making these signings. Filling needs and leaving us flexible enough to draft straight BPA. No panicked drafting of multiple players at the same position ala 2016 Draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are going to go 3-4, I actually don’t mind how we are shaping up at OLB. But  we desperately need some beef on the line. I assume the starting 3 would be butler, Poe, Short. Then who? We literally don’t have anyone else. 

We need to at least throw vet min at a couple of these aging guys. Sylvester Williams? Muhammad Wilkerson? A warm body?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Hurney is going BPA.

all the mocks are crazy. Some have all the OT gone before us and the best pass rushers and leaving corners, safeties or 2nd tier, 2nd round pass rushers we would over draft.

some mocks have the opposite, but run on defensive,... several OT options, safeties etc.

bottom line is few know what’s going to be there at 16 that is worth the best choice so he’s plugging the holes.

BPA,.. could be a great corner or Safety, could be OT, DE, 3/4 OLB or 4-3 OLB—

get the best player,..

That's my problem with this thinking.. Maybe in other drafts this is true.. But this year your supposedly 2nd teir Dlinemen would be 1st teir in a weaker draft.. 

Example  

Celine Ferrell last year and most of this year is a top 5 pick until other top 5 picks enter the draft.. This is the year you can get a top teir Dlinemen in the top 20 when in most years they would be gone in the top 10.. Because the draft is so unusually deep.. We should be able to get a day one starter on the In the trenches no matter what. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I think I’d rather have DT first over LT. LT in this draft is not a certainty for any of the tackles. Most are RTs or might be Gs or “might” work at LT. I like a few of the day 2/early day 3 tackles who have potential but wouldn’t waste pick 16 as a backup or as a not good enough for LT. We don’t want a Luke Joechel, gotta try him at guard guy. I’d rather have Wilkins and be able to save a poo ton of cap next year. Short and Poe releases combine to open up $20-24m, yes $20-24m in cap space and we are already at $47m in cap space (with Paradis and without Kalil). We’d be over $70m without those two so I won’t mind Wilkins at all.

I know DT is a need but edge rusher is bigger now.. I also think getting rid of Short or Poe is a next year move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Based on our visits, I’d bet Sweat or Wilkins at 16 and Adderley or Risner at 46 and a tackle in the 3rd. Definitely don’t know who will be there, but it’s seems like DL, S or OL, OL/DL the rest of the way with CB sprinkled in somewhere. 

I think Ferrell is in the running as well as Oliver if they are there..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

If Sweat isn’t there at 16, don’t be shocked if we switch to DE. We are looking heavily at DT and this is the draft to do that even if Short and Poe are next year cuts. We are down Love so far and Butler could be cut if we draft better.

This is a great DL class, not just Edge, but DT as well. 

Agree I think we can come away with both.. I just think "best case scenario" is starter edge rusher and development Dtackle .. Not the other way around..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...