Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mission this offseason was to fix the trenches..


Sub Zero

Recommended Posts

 

Oline upgrades and pass rush help so far..

With the best trench draft in years coming.. My money is on adding more players to both lines..

I agree with this plan and thought it was needed before the offseason started.. I hope Hurney is able to finish it out without getting side track by some skill position player ..  I like the idea of a hybrid system and I hope they add some young pieces in the draft to make that happen..

What do you guys think so far with this objection in mind??

#year of the trenches..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really pumped about the moves so far. They could always go south on us, like most of last year's free agents did but on paper this is looking like a really great offseason of filling needs at reasonable prices. Even the Reid signing at a price people initially bitched about looks to be better than average once the market for safeties opened up. 

Lets keep the momentum up, though. If we can get a solid veteran at FS and maybe extend someone like Shaq to save some coin, this could be a damn good free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney is going BPA.

all the mocks are crazy. Some have all the OT gone before us and the best pass rushers and leaving corners, safeties or 2nd tier, 2nd round pass rushers we would over draft.

some mocks have the opposite, but run on defensive,... several OT options, safeties etc.

bottom line is few know what’s going to be there at 16 that is worth the best choice so he’s plugging the holes.

BPA,.. could be a great corner or Safety, could be OT, DE, 3/4 OLB or 4-3 OLB—

get the best player,..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JARROD said:

Hurney is going BPA.

all the mocks are crazy. Some have all the OT gone before us and the best pass rushers and leaving corners, safeties or 2nd tier, 2nd round pass rushers we would over draft.

some mocks have the opposite, but run on defensive,... several OT options, safeties etc.

bottom line is few know what’s going to be there at 16 that is worth the best choice so he’s plugging the holes.

BPA,.. could be a great corner or Safety, could be OT, DE, 3/4 OLB or 4-3 OLB—

get the best player,..

That is what I love so much about the way we are making these signings. Filling needs and leaving us flexible enough to draft straight BPA. No panicked drafting of multiple players at the same position ala 2016 Draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are going to go 3-4, I actually don’t mind how we are shaping up at OLB. But  we desperately need some beef on the line. I assume the starting 3 would be butler, Poe, Short. Then who? We literally don’t have anyone else. 

We need to at least throw vet min at a couple of these aging guys. Sylvester Williams? Muhammad Wilkerson? A warm body?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Hurney is going BPA.

all the mocks are crazy. Some have all the OT gone before us and the best pass rushers and leaving corners, safeties or 2nd tier, 2nd round pass rushers we would over draft.

some mocks have the opposite, but run on defensive,... several OT options, safeties etc.

bottom line is few know what’s going to be there at 16 that is worth the best choice so he’s plugging the holes.

BPA,.. could be a great corner or Safety, could be OT, DE, 3/4 OLB or 4-3 OLB—

get the best player,..

That's my problem with this thinking.. Maybe in other drafts this is true.. But this year your supposedly 2nd teir Dlinemen would be 1st teir in a weaker draft.. 

Example  

Celine Ferrell last year and most of this year is a top 5 pick until other top 5 picks enter the draft.. This is the year you can get a top teir Dlinemen in the top 20 when in most years they would be gone in the top 10.. Because the draft is so unusually deep.. We should be able to get a day one starter on the In the trenches no matter what. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I think I’d rather have DT first over LT. LT in this draft is not a certainty for any of the tackles. Most are RTs or might be Gs or “might” work at LT. I like a few of the day 2/early day 3 tackles who have potential but wouldn’t waste pick 16 as a backup or as a not good enough for LT. We don’t want a Luke Joechel, gotta try him at guard guy. I’d rather have Wilkins and be able to save a poo ton of cap next year. Short and Poe releases combine to open up $20-24m, yes $20-24m in cap space and we are already at $47m in cap space (with Paradis and without Kalil). We’d be over $70m without those two so I won’t mind Wilkins at all.

I know DT is a need but edge rusher is bigger now.. I also think getting rid of Short or Poe is a next year move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Based on our visits, I’d bet Sweat or Wilkins at 16 and Adderley or Risner at 46 and a tackle in the 3rd. Definitely don’t know who will be there, but it’s seems like DL, S or OL, OL/DL the rest of the way with CB sprinkled in somewhere. 

I think Ferrell is in the running as well as Oliver if they are there..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

If Sweat isn’t there at 16, don’t be shocked if we switch to DE. We are looking heavily at DT and this is the draft to do that even if Short and Poe are next year cuts. We are down Love so far and Butler could be cut if we draft better.

This is a great DL class, not just Edge, but DT as well. 

Agree I think we can come away with both.. I just think "best case scenario" is starter edge rusher and development Dtackle .. Not the other way around..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...