Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam + Mescal


saX man

Recommended Posts

Hi ledrens, any savory mescal fans?

--

Also...

I see the Juan guy is trying but he looks tired and sucks.  

Bon voyage missionary dwetler.

Jawaan Taylor OT

Devin White LB

Brian Burns DE/EDGE

Christian Wilkins 3T

That right there is it.  One of those 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taylor- Would confirm Moton to LT, Taylor has never played LT either.  And was kept on the Right side by Florida's staff for a reason even when their LT wasnt good.

Devin White- either a smoke screen or Hurney really is a fanboy of LBs.  With going to a 3-4 you really only need 2 LBs vs 3 on the field.  Retaining Shaqs 5th year and drafting 2 last year.  Dont see it happening.  Oh, also Rivera's big pet Peeve with LBs has always been their ability in coverage.  While White is a good athlete, his coverage ability has been his biggest weakness.

Wilkins- would make sense with the 3-4. Versatile, played DE to start at Clemson.  Would immediately fill that hole as a 3-4 DE for the panthers.

Burns- not the first time someone on this board with a "source" has mentioned our staff likes Burns.  He is a glue fit for our Defense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Dex said:

Am I the only one that doesn't see Burns as a first round pick? Maybe late first/early second but at 16??

Pretty much

For a strictly 4-3 defense it may be tough to take him.

Ive seen a few writers say they like him more than Josh Allen.  Just overall versatility.  He may be the best edge rusher OLB as far as his drop back in coverage since Kalil Mack came out.  He has excellent bend.  The only concern people had on him was size, but he came in at 250 to the combine which is more than enough for a OLB.  So any other scheme besides a traditional 4-3. He is well worth the top 15 pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Pretty much

For a strictly 4-3 defense it may be tough to take him.

Ive seen a few writers say they like him more than Josh Allen.  Just overall versatility.  He may be the best edge rusher OLB as far as his drop back in coverage since Kalil Mack came out.  He has excellent bend.  The only concern people had on him was size, but he came in at 250 to the combine which is more than enough for a OLB

I can respect that. But when he's matched up against top tackles he's been a ghost. He's certainly a specimen though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Dex said:

I can respect that. But when he's matched up against top tackles he's been a ghost. He's certainly a specimen though.

He's mainly been a ghost this past year 

And that goes back to my first point.  That for a traditional 4-3 you may not like him that high.

 

This past season wasnt his best due to a scheme change.  He came to FSU recruited as a OLB in Jimbo's 3-4, and he looked like a monster in it.  This new staff moved to a strictly 4-3. So him in his 235 playing frame that he was still at from the year before struggled to fit the new scheme.  He kinda looked like Marquise Haynes did for the panthers this year and pushed around.

He is best off the edge as a OLB where he can use that versatility like Von Miller or Mack.  Either drop in coverage or fire off the edge.  

Actually speaking of Miller.  Burns first 2 seasons started off better(both playing 3-4 OLB) year 3 is when Miller blew up.  Burnsmoved to a new scheme that didnt fit him well and his stats didnt jump.

 

Years 1 and 2 for Miller at A&M

Fresh: 2.5 Sacks 4 TFL

Soph: 3.5 sacks 7.5 TFL

 

Burns

Freshman: 8.5 Sacks 9.5 TFL

Sophomore: 4.5 Sacks 13.5 TFL

 

Miller blew up his junior season while Burns switched to the new scheme that he wasnt recruited or fit for.

But

Von Miller 

Senior season: 10.5 sacks 17.5 TFL

Burns

This past season in new scheme: 10.5 sacks 15.5 TFL

 

They both played at 235 at the same position (minus Burns this past year). And both came into the combine at 250

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KaseKlosed said:

Burns at his best is Nick Bosa potential however he could also be Zack Bosa. Boom or Bust all over him 

That's what concerns me. But there are very few sure thing picks so we need to roll the dice anyhow. Hurney has a good track record in the 1st so I'm optimistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, KaseKlosed said:

Burns at his best is Nick Bosa potential however he could also be Zack Bosa. Boom or Bust all over him 

2 completly different players

Bosa the more traditional 4-3 DE, hands in dirt bigger guy.

 

Burns stand up more athletic rusher/LB like Miller and Mack were coming out.

Mack, Miller and Burns all played at around 235 in college as edge Linebackers who bulked up to 250 at the combine 

 

Miller combine

6'3 250.   4.53 40.   37vert.    126 broad  6.7 3cone

 

Mack combine 

6'3 251.   4.65. 40.   40vert.   128 broad.   7.08 3cone

 

 

Burns combine 

6'5 249.   4.53 40.   36vert.    129 broad.  7.01 3cones

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And its two fold from there, we knew we were going to stink next year, we knew he wasnt going to play right away and we knew the 2025 rb class was absolutely fuging loaded.  So none of it made a lick of sense
    • Here for the lively debate but don’t devolve into “you don’t know the game” stuff. ..with that PSA over, I lean more to the it was a mistake camp myself.  It wasn’t a good move. Many people reference Frazier but it is was a few guys. I thought Sainristil would have been perfect for us. Although I will say, I don’t mind taking RBs high depending on the talent. It was him being injured and his talent relative to the other RBs in his tier that makes me less than thrilled about it. 
    • If you're insinuating Bryce Young is the only player people here have been critical of we don't even need to discuss any further because folks who have actually seen the threads knows that's factually incorrect. That's the issue and where the disconnect begins. You perceive an honest assessment and basic straightforward acknowledgment that while we can like the player on a personal level ultimately the pick was a mistake given what we know now and the other prospects that were available. None of that is the personal slight you perceive it to be. Honest discussion is not doom and gloom. If someone wants to reject the reality is front of them that is certainly their prerogative. What I'm trying to tell you is you are never going to find the dialogue you seek as long as this is your basis for the framework of discussion about our team. I'm not asking you to leave. I do believe you bring legitimate value here. I'm simply offering you an alternative if you insist on rolling out this same approach when the season rolls out. Because although optimism is high right now sooner or later we might hit a bump in the road. And conversations will likely get the opposite of glowing positivity. But that's alright. That's the rollercoaster of sports fandom. We'll survive.
×
×
  • Create New...