Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Film breakdown of Rashaan Gaulden


Recommended Posts

Good breakdown. Sort of alludes to the obvious weaknesses but does highlight his potential and some of the skills that he did show last year. 

I am definitely skeptical of Gaulden being the guy and just having a project player starting as a whole. But, it is what it is right now. He's going to be the guy for us next season, so hopefully he can make a lot of progress this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Good breakdown. Sort of alludes to the obvious weaknesses but does highlight his potential and some of the skills that he did show last year. 

I am definitely skeptical of Gaulden being the guy and just having a project player starting as a whole. But, it is what it is right now. He's going to be the guy for us next season, so hopefully he can make a lot of progress this offseason.

If he can wrap his head around the position, I think there could be good potential. I would love for him to take those steps, because can you imagine the hammers that would be dropped between Reid and him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

If he can wrap his head around the position, I think there could be good potential. I would love for him to take those steps, because can you imagine the hammers that would be dropped between Reid and him?

I just hope the light comes on sooner rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not sure our faith to address the safety position points to the coaching staff having confidence in Gaulden. It's the norm for us not to address the position and try to make do with scraps.

The biggest difference is the move from proven vets who know exactly what we want to a young project player. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems Gaulden has a LB or SS mentality, as long as things are in front of him and he's able to play downhill, he's fine.  However when he's has to drop in coverage, he seems timid.  That's one thing you can't have is a FS that is unsure of his coverage skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The biggest difference is the move from proven vets who know exactly what we want to a young project player. It will be interesting to see what happens.

We'll see. I'm not at all convinced that our starting FS won't eventually end up being some vet on his last legs that doesn't make the final roster elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

 Nice breakdown thanks for the post

I really like the stuff this kid puts out.  Not just someone sitting behind the desk talking. He does great film breakdowns.   And seems to know what he is talking about.  

I have listened to their podcast a couple times.  It’s OK. But the film stuff this kid does is top notch. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It seems Gaulden has a LB or SS mentality, as long as things are in front of him and he's able to play downhill, he's fine.  However when he's has to drop in coverage, he seems timid.  That's one thing you can't have is a FS that is unsure of his coverage skills.

I think that has more to do with his lack of experience than actual timidness.  He's still figuring things out and learning the new position.  He's still thinking rather than just reading and reacting to what he sees.  That was always my issue with the naysayers in regards to Gaulden.  Anyone that was paying attention knew that there would be a learning curve, and that year one was going to basically be a redshirt, adjustment year. 

Unfortunately, many didn't/don't have the patience to let a player develop.  They expect them to be ready to play right out of the box, but that's not how it works for the majority of players.  I think people also tend to see one mistake and generalize that to exemplify their overall talent and skillset...especially when it's a player that hasn't seen much field time).

  I don't know if he's going to be the answer or not (we haven't seen enough to get a realistic idea), but I do think he has the potential to be a solid safety once he gets comfortable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We'll see. I'm not at all convinced that our starting FS won't eventually end up being some vet on his last legs that doesn't make the final roster elsewhere.

Unless he is just a disaster at camp, then I wouldn't expect to see that move until early to mid-season. That would be pretty typical of us too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT.  Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up.      I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss.   
    • reality is the piling on of Frank Reich is just the standard huddle angle we take of putting all blame on someone after the fact.   as I was an OG Frank hater before it was cool to be......now the swing goes too far the other way and people will claim me is as a Frank defender.  Frank Reich was the definition of a .500 middle of the road NFL coach.  He technically was a winning coach and above .500 coming here but he is and was NFL average.  we were the biggest joke in a decade.....because they paired Frank Reich (a dude who was going to do what he does in the NFL) with a dude who couldn't do NFL basics and Frank was forced to play him.  That's not Frank being a loser.  That a bad org around Frank. 
    • Toronto is less physical than us, and they took them to 7  I really wish they would have won, because we match up better with them, but we have to deal with what we got  What worries me is Svech trying to take out Bob, that is desperation, that's what you do when you feel like there is no legit options left, it's what I feared, Bob is still in our core groups head, and they are over thinking, over passing Hopefully that changes tonight   
×
×
  • Create New...