Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Reid gettin' tested...


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Happy Panther said:

I was just about to post that if someone had solid numbers we could figure out the probability of being tested so much. Wiki already did it.

That means 1 out of 588 players should be tested that much each year and there are almost 1700 players in the nfl...

This is nothing new.  Quote from James Harrison from 2 yrs ago saying some guys get tested as many as 9 times.

“Some guys go all year and don’t get a random test,” Harrison said. “Some guys get tested five, six, seven, eight, nine times.”

https://www.espn.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/92747/from-bathrooms-to-grannys-house-nfl-drug-testers-will-find-you

Something in Reid's background has put him on the testing company's radar screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SBiii said:

 

Something in Reid's background has put him on the testing company's radar screen.

Hey Veronica Mars - care to share what that “something” in Reid’s background is? I’d love to hear it considering he has never failed a drug test, been arrested, or had any off the field issues that I am aware of. LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 4Corners said:

Hey Veronica Mars - care to share what that “something” in Reid’s background is? I’d love to hear it considering he has never failed a drug test, been arrested, or had any off the field issues that I am aware of. LOL!

3 times in 8 months is really not that bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I am sympathetic if he is getting tested this much. 

However, devil's advocate, I have not seen proof that he has gotten tested. No photos of the requests or the results, you would think there would be a paper trail of all of that. 

If he posted proof of each request and or passed test it would go further in gaining sympathy from the public at large, and would even garner media attention/assistance. Granted, he might not legally be allowed to do that, but I would assume he could black out the information that would get him in trouble. 

Saying that, I don't necessarily believe the NFL is telling the truth either. I KNOW they won't provide any proof one way or the other. 

Either way, me personally, I would like more proof over he said she said stuff. 

Yeah. I'm inclined to believe Eric but the way he's going about this isn't helping his case. The NFL's calling you a liar bro, you've gotta come through with receipts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Hey Veronica Mars - care to share what that “something” in Reid’s background is? I’d love to hear it considering he has never failed a drug test, been arrested, or had any off the field issues that I am aware of. LOL!

What u may or may not be aware of is irrelevant.

The NFL & NFLPA have a Reasonable Cause policy under which the Independent Administrator will use to place certain players into the testing program.  If u want to read up on it and learn a bit go to page-8 in the link that follows.  Assuming he is being tested as much as he claims from where I sit the only logical explanation is something in his past has landed him in the Reasonable Cause program.

https://nflpaweb.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/PDFs/2018 Policy on Performance-Enhancing Substances.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SBiii said:

What u may or may not be aware of is irrelevant.

The NFL & NFLPA have a Reasonable Cause policy under which the Independent Administrator will use to place certain players into the testing program.  If u want to read up on it and learn a bit go to page-8 in the link that follows.  Assuming he is being tested as much as he claims from where I sit the only logical explanation is something in his past has landed him in the Reasonable Cause program.

https://nflpaweb.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/PDFs/2018 Policy on Performance-Enhancing Substances.pdf

 

Yeah, he filed a lawsuit against them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2019 at 1:10 PM, AggieLean said:

“If you are clean, you have nothing to worry about” 

*insert spongebob gif*

Easy for those to say who don’t have to constantly get tested, or who isn’t constantly messed with. At some point you have to speak on the wrong done to you.

Anyways, Eric is looking good. 

What wrong? They have a drug testing policy and he gets tested. Without knowing how often other people get tested, how do you know it's right or wrong? If you see an average person walking into a gym looking like that, it's usually a safe assumption that they are on something anabolic. You don't get that muscle mass WHILE remaining that lean without one of two things: steroids or genetics. Oftentimes it's both of those. For Reid, it would appear it's one. But beating the tests isn't that difficult which is why they test continuously. 

Would they be so conspicuous of their malcontent with such a prominent player as Reid to subject him to testing unjustly purely out of an intent to get him out of the league? They would be far more subtle than that. The fun thing about conspiracy theories (like the Trump-Russia Collusion stuff), is that while they are fun to imagine, they most likely aren't true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Yeah. I'm inclined to believe Eric but the way he's going about this isn't helping his case. The NFL's calling you a liar bro, you've gotta come through with receipts.

Who is to say he is getting tested more than other players though? Even then, who is to say what the motivation for increased testing is? His pictures would be reason enough for me to order testing if I worked for the NFL. It's next to impossible to get that lean while maintaining muscle mass and weight without some muscle growth assistance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Captroop said:

They don't even have to actually spike it. If they really want to send a message to him, a false positive is more than enough to get the job done.

Here's how I see it playing out if the league were dirty: He gets a positive test result the week before a big game, and he is forced to sit. He spends weeks trying to appeal as the league slow-rolls re-running the sample. By the time, they re-run the test, and the league issues a mea culpa, "Oh, there was a mix-up at the lab. Reid's test is clean and he's clear to play," Reid has already missed 3-4 weeks.

I could see that happening honestly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

What wrong? They have a drug testing policy and he gets tested. Without knowing how often other people get tested, how do you know it's right or wrong? true. 

Based on articles about James Harrison from 2 and 3 years ago he was tested just as much or more than Reid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFPA did their own investing and came away with NO EVINDENCE that he was being targeted or tested more than normal. So I guess the players union has it out for Reid tooo, correct????

 people with fake agendas and suckas that believe them have become the worst thing in this era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SBiii said:

What u may or may not be aware of is irrelevant.

The NFL & NFLPA have a Reasonable Cause policy under which the Independent Administrator will use to place certain players into the testing program.  If u want to read up on it and learn a bit go to page-8 in the link that follows.  Assuming he is being tested as much as he claims from where I sit the only logical explanation is something in his past has landed him in the Reasonable Cause program.

https://nflpaweb.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/PDFs/2018 Policy on Performance-Enhancing Substances.pdf

 

So you don’t have any facts, only speculation. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...