Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen tries to calm down the chicken littles


panthers55

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, rayzor said:

he can talk all he wants, but that isn't going to make the OL look better. they have issues and as long as they have issues keeping cam upright, the whole team has issues.

is the OL better than what they have shown? prove it.

Exactly right

one on one they look like trash. 

They look no different than against the Steelers....hit them in the mouth and it’s over 

if NE had wanted to against our first string, it could have been much worse 

Aaron Donald against Paradis.  I know who I’m taking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen reassuring fans isn't going to just magically make the o-line play better week 1. It's not even about scheme, our o-line has been getting individually manhandled this preseason. Yeah, it takes time to gel, but Cam could be hurt by the time they get it together. I swear if we let Cam drop back 7 yards every pass play against the Rams week 1, Rivera needs to be fired on the spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, countryboi said:

man the trenches are one of the few things that translate from the preseason to the regular season. if you are having protection issues and problems getting to the QB in the preseason they aint going no where when the season starts. 

That assumes our line is stable and established. When you have several guys learning a new position and o e is your center calling protections there is a significant learning curve gelling with this line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Olsen reassuring fans isn't going to just magically make the o-line play better week 1. It's not even about scheme, our o-line has been getting individually manhandled this preseason. Yeah, it takes time to gel, but Cam could be hurt by the time they get it together. I swear if we let Cam drop back 7 yards every pass play against the Rams week 1, Rivera needs to be fired on the spot.

When players think about what to do instead of react they will be unsure, slow and look bad. Once they know what each other is going to do they look much better.  And if Cam drops back 7 steps every time that is on him not Norv. He had the ability to change any play and control the protections and audibles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

you don't have to be a chicken little to notice that the QB is falling. it's pretty stinking obvious, same with the reason...the OL sucks.

No gameplanning, new center, 2 or 3 series against a team all out blitzing. Yeah if you put too much into that you are a chicken little. It's pretty stinking obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The way some of our fanbase acts as if everything Panthers is infallible and anyone expressing any concern is to be dismissed as a negative Nancy or a hater, you'd think we were stacking rings like the Pats or Steelers.

While others see everything negative  and anyone who supports the team or thinks things will be okay are labeled homers and nut huggers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

No gameplanning, new center, 2 or 3 series against a team all out blitzing. Yeah if you put too much into that you are a chicken little. It's pretty stinking obvious.

Thank you Mr. Superfan. You're such a better fan than any of us, knowing when to put on blinders and tow the company line and all that....avoiding objectivity and critical observation at all costs. What would we ever do without your fan-expertise? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

While others see everything negative  and anyone who supports the team or thinks things will be okay are labeled homers and nut huggers.

  Who are these people that see everything negative. I mean everything. Because that is the only way their opinion loses credibility. Just like thinking Everything about the team is always the right thing ruins any chance of getting an unbiased observation from that person. Or does that only work one way for agenda purposes? Awful convenient. 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Thank you Mr. Superfan. You're such a better fan than any of us, knowing when to put on blinders and tow the company line and all that....avoiding objectivity and critical observation at all costs. What would we ever do without your fan-expertise? 

Don't know why all the negativity. Who said I was better than anyone else? I didn't. In fact the other day I said I prefer to be positive and optimistic but that is me and I speak for myself. No one else 

I just don't agree that objectivity or critical observation has to be negative. We all see what we want to see 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  Who are these people that see everything negative. I mean everything. Because that is the only way their opinion loses credibility. Just like thinking Everything about the team is always the right thing ruins any chance of getting an unbiased observation from that person. Or does that only work one way for agenda purposes? Awful convenient. 

  

I didn't say everyone was negative, I simply said if you are positive and optimistic  posters here call you a homer. Just like you have called me the other day. Again,  believe what you want and think whatever you like.  It doesn't matter to me and I don't care what other folks do. I state my opinion which apparently isn't the popular one these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...