Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the h€££ did you not go after Clowney?


panfanman

Recommended Posts

With the news that Houston paid half his salary and that it basically cost them a 3rd plus throw ins, I would have definitely been in on that. My concern was paying him $16M which we didn’t have. We definitely could have made $8M work.

Now his list was supposedly just the Seahawks and Eagles but surely he could have been persuaded to come play at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is it's ultimately a one year rental.

Seattle has no guarantee Clowney signs an extension with them. Even if he does sign next year, any possible extension will be well over 100 million dollars if he has a big season.

Personally I absolutely would have liked to acquire Clowney, but realistically he is not worth Kalil Mack money, which is absolutely what he will end up commanding from Seattle if they intend on extending him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Why the H311 do you invest more into one of the deepest positions on the team

2. Why the H€€ do you trade for a guy who you cant come close to affording 

3. Why the H€€€ do you trade for a guy as injured prone for the price youll pay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bartin said:

With the news that Houston paid half his salary and that it basically cost them a 3rd plus throw ins, I would have definitely been in on that. My concern was paying him $16M which we didn’t have. We definitely could have made $8M work.

Now his list was supposedly just the Seahawks and Eagles but surely he could have been persuaded to come play at home.

How is that possible? He didn’t sign his tender until after the trade.... the texans didn’t have to pay him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bartin said:

With the news that Houston paid half his salary and that it basically cost them a 3rd plus throw ins, I would have definitely been in on that. My concern was paying him $16M which we didn’t have. We definitely could have made $8M work.

Now his list was supposedly just the Seahawks and Eagles but surely he could have been persuaded to come play at home.

He has been pushing for a new deal.  So yes, they are only paying. 8 off the current deal but he's wanting to get paid.  I believe he wasnt to happy with the franchise tag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheRed said:

The problem is it's ultimately a one year rental.

Seattle has no guarantee Clowney signs an extension with them. Even if he does sign next year, any possible extension will be well over 100 million dollars if he has a big season.

Personally I absolutely would have liked to acquire Clowney, but realistically he is not worth Kalil Mack money, which is absolutely what he will end up commanding from Seattle if they intend on extending him.

But the cost was just a 3rd round pick and if he walked after the year we would get a 3rd round comp pick which essentially makes the cost of acquiring him swapping a 2020 3rd for 2021 3rd comp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

How is that possible? He didn’t sign his tender until after the trade.... the texans didn’t have to pay him. 

He had to sign his tender before a trade was actually possible to complete. That’s how he was able to say no to the Dolphins. So the order of things is the two teams agreed to the terms, Clowney signs the tender with the Texans, the Texans bonus him $8M then they completed the trade which left Seattle with $8M to cover on the rest of his salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...