Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive line played well? Nextgen stats argues they were really bad.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I would like to see some things change that could help the OL---if we were on the LOS sooner, they could alter the cadence and detect blitz giveaways.  The when you are snapping the ball on a hand clap at 1 second on the play clock, the DL tend to tee off.

Ahh this would be really smart. I wonder why we don't get to the line faster? Is it cause Ron Rivera wants to slow the pace down to rest his defense?

Find out NEXT WEEK on PANTHERS FOOTBALL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, philit99 said:

I still cannot understand why we don't roll out, bootleg, screen more, and run some 21 and 22 personnel to allow for more time. Maybe, Cam is not accurate on the move, that is the only reason I can think as to why we don't bootleg. Hell, Atlanta and Michael Vick made a living torching teams with bootlegs.

Not hating on Newton but his screen attempts didn't look too good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panthers are good said:

Ahh this would be really smart. I wonder why we don't get to the line faster? Is it cause Ron Rivera wants to slow the pace down to rest his defense?

Find out NEXT WEEK on PANTHERS FOOTBALL

That is not how football is played in the 1980's. LOL. bRontosaurus does not approve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Most of Tom Brady's career has been passes with the ball out in under 3 seconds.  It's not a bad thing.  The difference between us and them is that they are hitting the receivers in stride, and the scheme is designed in such a way that leaves the receivers wide open.  

Combination of bad passing and lack of creativity in the route designs.

There were a lot of receivers wide open on Sunday for us. Sometimes 2 and 3 on the same play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

There were a lot of receivers wide open on Sunday for us. Sometimes 2 and 3 on the same play.

Curl out routes are low percentage in general and that's what Norv rolled with in general on the verticals.

Also, just because a receiver is open doesn't mean he's part of the read. Reminder, football is not like madden where a QB can see the whole field. OC's dictate what a QB primary read is on certain play, which may be just one receiver or bust a lot of the time. Half-field reads and less are most reasonable in the NFL, with full-field reads being a once in a blue moon type of deal.

For last sunday, Cam's progression always started short and would move out as necessary. Plenty of receivers looked open, but they were not the primary read or even part of it at times. Not on Cam Newton, as the playcalls dictated a certain line of progression and ensuring the ball is out quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, philit99 said:

I still cannot understand why we don't roll out, bootleg, screen more, and run some 21 and 22 personnel to allow for more time. Maybe, Cam is not accurate on the move, that is the only reason I can think as to why we don't bootleg. Hell, Atlanta and Michael Vick made a living torching teams with bootlegs.

Cam is the best dual threat QB of all time.

He is not the best scrambler and passer.  He is much better from the pocket than on the move, whereas Russ is better on the move than in the pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Curl out routes are low percentage in general and that's what Norv rolled with in general on the verticals.

Also, just because a receiver is open doesn't mean he's part of the read. Reminder, football is not like madden where a QB can see the whole field. OC's dictate what a QB primary read is on certain play, which may be just one receiver or bust a lot of the time. Half-field reads and less are most reasonable in the NFL, with full-field reads being a once in a blue moon type of deal.

For last sunday, Cam's progression always started short and would move out as necessary. Plenty of receivers looked open, but they were not the primary read or even part of it at times. Not on Cam Newton, as the playcalls dictated a certain line of progression and ensuring the ball is out quickly.

Don't know how you can know that if you don't know what play was called or whether receivers ran the right route or what audibles were called. Watching his eyes may tell you what happened but not always what should have happened.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...