Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Special Teams


CRA

Recommended Posts

So until we are out I want to win every game we can.   So to win this week we need to help Allen out.  Which means we need good sound ball around him. 

Which means I am going  to come out against the Ray Ray McCloud experiment.  He IMO is too high risk/reward.   And I am not certain how high that reward actually is.  

He got a shot last year in Buffalo to return punts.  Muffing/fumbling was a problem. 

Ron gave him a shot.  Muffing/fumbling again a problem in his one appearance.   Just because we didn’t lose them doesn’t then make them not an issue. 

I think we need a new punt returner this week.  Safe is better IMO.  We can’t afford to lose the turnover battle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had an awful muff for sure, but he has had some solid returns.

I would be down for Pharoah Cooper, but I'm not unhappy with McCloud other than one play. I think he brings a lot more to returns than Godwin (who just lacked explosiveness) did. And Godwin muffed punts too...

STs is all about risk vs reward.  I think McCloud has been a solid addition so far.

I was pro-Byrd for a long time, but he simply couldn't stay healthy here.

Of the issues with this team, I think ST and defense are chasms of depth above the abyss that has been the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Should have kept Byrd imo, injury or not that man did not muff punts from what I can remember and also could fill in at the 4th or 5th WR spot, you would think we’d put more emphasis on it 

byrd looks great in kingsbury's offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

He had an awful muff for sure, but he has had some solid returns.

I would be down for Pharoah Cooper, but I'm not unhappy with McCloud other than one play. I think he brings a lot more to returns than Godwin (who just lacked explosiveness) did. And Godwin muffed punts too...

STs is all about risk vs reward.  I think McCloud has been a solid addition so far.

I was pro-Byrd for a long time, but he simply couldn't stay healthy here.

Of the issues with this team, I think ST and defense are chasms of depth above the abyss that has been the offense.

It wasn’t just one.  He muffed 2 out 3. 

which is exactly what got took him off the field last year when Buffalo tried it. 

I’m a firm believer that you either are or aren’t an NFL returner.   Just seems too risky with where we are . And it isn’t like his upside is Devin Hester to make it worth the risk.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The sad thing is though that just about anybody who's available right now is likely to have the same or other issues.

This was something we needed to take care of in the offseason, not three weeks in.

I don’t know...

I’m pretty sure there are plenty of guys who lack the upside but can perform the basic duties of the return job.   Sometimes a Mark Jones type is the better answer when you can’t afford to be risky.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don’t know...

I’m pretty sure there are plenty of guys who lack the upside but can perform the basic duties of the return job.   Sometimes a Mark Jones type is the better answer when you can’t afford to be risky.  

That's kind of the question.

If you want a guy who just basically won't drop the ball but isn't necessarily going to get you a lot of yards, you can probably find that.  And that would be a very Ron Rivera type move.

That's not gonna do a lot for your field position game, but that's the trade off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's kind of the question.

If you want a guy who just basically won't drop the ball but isn't necessarily going to get you a lot of yards, you can probably find that.  And that would be a very Ron Rivera type move.

That's not gonna do a lot for your field position game, but that's the trade off.

Well I guess that is my point.  

With a young backup QB I guess you can go about it two ways.  Try to limit the errors everywhere else because frankly you know their will be some issues on O. Or gamble more elsewhere to try to aid him because he will make mistakes. 

I would say game 1 with Ray Ray....the risk isn’t worth it though.  You muff it as consistently as he has in limited opportunities over two years then you better be Devin Hester 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well I guess that is my point.  

With a young backup QB I guess you can go about it two ways.  Try to limit the errors everywhere else because frankly you know their will be some issues on O. Or gamble more elsewhere to try to aid him because he will make mistakes. 

Me? If I'm looking at a young quarterback doing his first (real) start, I'm probably looking to get him all the help he can get. That means a return man that can get some good field position.

Granted, the opposite mindset is just as valid. It's just a matter of what you prefer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...