Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McDermott had to remove Belichick’s son from sideline


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/sean-mcdermott-escorts-bill-belichicks-son-off-the-field-during-pregame-warmups-for-patriots-bills-game/

Dude hung around after everyone else left. Sean didn’t like it and escorted him off the field. 

Kind of makes you think how the Pats are winning games all the times especially when they all of a sudden come from behind and keep scoring and opponent can't stop them. A Pats staff member hanging around watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Kind of makes you think how the Pats are winning games all the times especially when they all of a sudden come from behind and keep scoring and opponent can't stop them. A Pats staff member hanging around watching.

Watching warm ups is the secret? I think the game film all coaches watch would be where answers are found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah. Wouldn't necessarily expect a lot from watching warmups.

With that said, a certain level of paranoia is warranted when you're playing Belichick.

Actually, make that a high level of paranoia.

Yeah I’d be paranoid about Bellicheat too, but for the life of me I can’t figure what advantage could be gained. Better safe than sorry I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

Yeah I’d be paranoid about Bellicheat too, but for the life of me I can’t figure what advantage could be gained. Better safe than sorry I guess.

Me neither, but honestly if I were in McDermott's position I'd probably be checking my shirt lapels for listening devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Yeah I’d be paranoid about Bellicheat too, but for the life of me I can’t figure what advantage could be gained. Better safe than sorry I guess.

Mangini who worked with BB for years said regarding this topic that teams will run through formations they run during the game in pregame and the Pats like to watch to see if there is anything new they haven’t seen on tape or if someone is lining up in a different place than where they normally would. They can also see who might be the backup at some positions when guys are rotated through.

Not really anything groundbreaking but it is some more information you can use to your advantage so you aren’t caught off guard. But again if you are showing your secrets during pregame where 70k people can watch you then you’ve got bigger problems. Like great you got 2 people off the field, did you account for someone in the booth or the media who might tweet it out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...