Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4 undefeated QBs

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Cpt slay a ho Mentor

Cpt slay a ho

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    I think we have both Kyle, and Grier for 3 more years. If Cam is healthy, I don't see either one of them getting a second contract from us. I would hope both would want to spread their wings and leave the nest.

 

    That all hinges on Cam getting back to, and staying, healthy for at least the next 3-4 years. By then, we will have to find another backup. But that is small price to pay for a healthy Cam.

The perfect scenario, we pull a NE and flip both players for picks, I’d be ecstatic if we got a 2nd out of either and a 3rd for the other like NE did with Jimmy G and Brissett  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

Love that he is playing solid and he has potential. The last two wins have been CMC and the defense making stops to win. I mean they only allowed 10 points to the Texans at Houston. CMC had a crazy game last week yet we had to have our defense stop their final drive to win. I’m sure part of it is Norv and Ron keeping him on a short leash. How many Saints fans are wanting Teddy to stay as the starter when Brees gets healthy because they are winning with him and the team is playing better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

The perfect scenario, we pull a NE and flip both players for picks, I’d be ecstatic if we got a 2nd out of either and a 3rd for the other like NE did with Jimmy G and Brissett  

 

    Depending on how well Kyle plays until Cam comes back. No telling what we may be able to get for him. A legitimate starting QB is not cheap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Love that he is playing solid and he has potential. The last two wins have been CMC and the defense making stops to win. I mean they only allowed 10 points to the Texans at Houston. CMC had a crazy game last week yet we had to have our defense stop their final drive to win. I’m sure part of it is Norv and Ron keeping him on a short leash. How many Saints fans are wanting Teddy to stay as the starter when Brees gets healthy because they are winning with him and the team is playing better?

The win in Houston was a direct result of KA's play on the final drive.  IN Jacksonville we left 14 points on the field, not getting those points had nothing to do with Kyle's play.  You can say CMC did all the work, but without Kyle Allen we would have lost that game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cpt slay a ho Mentor

Cpt slay a ho

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Depending on how well Kyle plays until Cam comes back. No telling what we may be able to get for him. A legitimate starting QB is not cheap. 

True the only thing is there are less qb needy teams than normal, but I’m sure we can find someone to bite 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

The win in Houston was a direct result of KA's play on the final drive.  IN Jacksonville we left 14 points on the field, not getting those points had nothing to do with Kyle's play.  You can say CMC did all the work, but without Kyle Allen we would have lost that game. 

He also had 3 TOs in the Houston game. His stats at home against the Jags 17/30 for 181 yards and a TD. I will say it was great he had no TOs against that Jaguar defensive line (he did fumble).  Best case scenario is he plays great and Cam plays great and we can trade one for draft capital. Outside of the Cardinals game I haven’t seen much that screams franchise QB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cpt slay a ho Mentor

Cpt slay a ho

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

If he truly is a capable starter why would be trade him with our current QB about to be in a contract year? 

A lot of reasons, if he’s just a capable starter than you trade him while he’s hot, we already have an investment in Grier even if cam struggles or gets hurt. 

Of course that’s a different conversation if the staff believes his ceiling is higher than just a capable starter. 

Cam’s contract year effects nothing, we still have a backup plan in Grier if for any reason there’s a contract extension issue 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBiii Newbie

SBiii

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Man, unpopular opinion but you really have to consider shopping the kid in the off-season. His stock is as high as it will ever be.

Given the respective retention costs might we be better off shopping Cam?

I see people CONSTANTLY harping on the price vs. production for Slye & Gano....

....are true fans willing to apply the same paradigm to Kyle & Cam?

Might we better off to secure a trove of assets for Cam and place them around both Luke & Kyle who both seem to be supreme game managers on both sides of the ball?

What say ye?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SBiii said:

Given the respective retention costs might we be better off shopping Cam?

I see people CONSTANTLY harping on the price vs. production for Slye & Gano....

....are true fans willing to apply the same paradigm to Kyle & Cam?

Might we better off to secure a trove of assets for Cam and place them around both Luke & Kyle who both seem to be supreme game managers on both sides of the ball?

What say ye?!?

 

    As a true fan, and don't take this the wrong way...but, you are a goob. What say ye?

 

    Let's trade our future HOF QB, and go with a game manager. One that seems to be regressing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, t96 said:

Kyle has been very solid in getting us wins but this is definitely an example of where passer rating doesn’t tell the whole story... 

Yep.  Kyle’s been very good for us.  But passer rating sucks, the only game he meaningfully contributed to the win, rather than just not losing the game for us, was Arizona. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBiii Newbie

SBiii

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

Let's trade our future HOF QB, and go with a game manager.

One that seems to be regressing?

Fella, "game managers" dominate this league (a fact clearly lost on you).  

  "Game manager" = Super Bowl winning QB's = Brady, Wilson, Flacco, Manning (2), Foles, Dilfer, Plunkett, Theismann, Warner, Starr, Griese, Johnson, Rypien, Montana....

....not a single Superman® QB in the lot.

Yeah, sign me up for a top-notch game manager.

PS....your "regressing" assertion = #FakeNews

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, SBiii said:

Fella, "game managers" dominate this league (a fact clearly lost on you).  

  "Game manager" = Super Bowl winning QB's = Brady, Wilson, Flacco, Manning (2), Foles, Dilfer, Plunkett, Theismann, Warner, Starr, Griese, Johnson, Rypien, Montana....

....not a single Superman® QB in the lot.

Yeah, sign me up for a top-notch game manager.

PS....your "regressing" assertion = #FakeNews

 

    Not one thing you wrote is true. Tell ya what there, forget I ever said anything. I obviously made a mistake. Sorry, it won't happen again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...