Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What record will it take to get a wildcard spot


PleaseCutStewart

Recommended Posts

If we don't beat out the Saints to win the division, what record will it take to reach the playoffs as a wildcard?

Seahawks have an easy 2 next games, but after that their schedule is pretty brutal the rest of the year minus a game against Arizona.

Vikings also have a pretty tough schedule after Washington next Thursday.

Rams still have the talent to reach the playoffs.

I'm thinking we can't be any worse than 10-6, and that may be tough with our NFC record possibly being bad. It might take 11-5 to reach the playoffs, which is a tall order.

@49ers, @packers, 2 with the Saints, Seahawks, and @Colts will all be tough games - and that's assuming we avoid a stinker against the Falcons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

yeah, that home loss to Tampa was a killer, both for conference record and division record if we split with NO and have the same record

Saints had a lot of close wins against average competition. There schedule is not much easier than ours. Beating the bears with no QB or offense is not that big of a thing. Allen is an upgrade vs Trubisky. Not only the ducks Trubisky threw but he lucked out with 2 missed FG from the saints and he had a lot of passes that should have been picked And the luck went the other way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Snake said:

I would say 13-3 or at the least 12-4.

 

22 minutes ago, GoPanthers123 said:

We have 2 NFC losses too.  I think 11-5 and get help from upsets.

11-5 maybe 10-6. If the conference keeps sinking though 9-7. We are a game back from any of those right now though. If we beat San Fran though we’ll get that game back. Except V. LA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10-6 teams missing the playoffs is pretty common place. It honestly probably happens in more seasons than not. Meanwhile, only two 11-5 teams have ever missed the playoffs. No 12-4 team has ever missed the playoffs.

So, I'll say our odds are probably less than 50% at 10-6 but damn near guaranteed at 11-5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

 

11-5 maybe 10-6. If the conference keeps sinking though 9-7. We are a game back from any of those right now though. If we beat San Fran though we’ll get that game back. Except V. LA.

Yeah the 49ers is a huge game. Lose that one and we need to sweep the saints and Falcons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

10-6 teams missing the playoffs is pretty common place. It honestly probably happens in more seasons than not. Meanwhile, only two 11-5 teams have ever missed the playoffs. No 12-4 team has ever missed the playoffs.

So, I'll say our odds are probably less than 50% at 10-6 but damn near guaranteed at 11-5.

It’s doesn’t. 9 teams have missed sense the current format. It’s been 29 years. Most years a 10-6 team makes it, a little over 66 percent of the time. Being we have no clue what the season brings for any team when I is not half way in, I say 10-6 probably makes it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers have won 4 in a row and if the playoffs started today would currently be out. The NFC is stacked this year so with our 2 early losses there is really no margin for error.

The NFC East looks like a 2 team race between Dallas and Philly with only the divisional winner making it in. Washington and the Giants are going no where fast. Washington will have a new head coach next season and Gettlemagic hasn't quite worked so well for the G-men yet.

NFC North has the Packers and Vikings rolling. They play against the NFC East and AFC West this year so it's not too many games left on their schedule were the Packers and Vikings won't be the more talented team. The Bears and Detroit can be dangerous opponents but I don't see either one making a run this season.

The NFC West is the best division in the NFC with every team .500 or better, even the Cardinals which is looking like a better win each week, (Panthers gave them their worst loss of the season). The NFC West teams are going to beat up on each other don't know how that shakes out but I don't think they get 3 teams from the division into the playoffs.

The NFC South is a two team race with the Saints and the Panthers battle of the backups. The Panthers are 1-1 against NFC West teams while the Saints are 0-1. Good thing for the Panthers all of our toughest games will be on the road and we should favored in most home games. If we could steal a game or two on the road I see 10 wins being the magic number for getting a wildcard spot. 

The NFL is the quintessential week to week league though, so what is down can be up. Alot more games to play, just hope the Panthers keep this mojo going and take it to the 49ers next week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, lovelett said:

It’s doesn’t. 9 teams have missed sense the current format. It’s been 29 years. Most years a 10-6 team makes it, a little over 66 percent of the time. Being we have no clue what the season brings for any team when I is not half way in, I say 10-6 probably makes it. 

10-6 very well could get it done, I just think this might be one of the years that it doesn't. Right now in the NFC , you have a two 5-2 teams in 2nd place in their division then you have us at 4-2 in 2nd place and the Rams are in 3rd in their division at 4-3. Then you have the overall weak NFC East where the 7th best record in the conference is leading the division. 

A lot can change, but right now it's shaping up to be the perfect storm for a really good team to be left at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

If we don't beat out the Saints to win the division, what record will it take to reach the playoffs as a wildcard?

Seahawks have an easy 2 next games, but after that their schedule is pretty brutal the rest of the year minus a game against Arizona.

Vikings also have a pretty tough schedule after Washington next Thursday.

Rams still have the talent to reach the playoffs.

I'm thinking we can't be any worse than 10-6, and that may be tough with our NFC record possibly being bad. It might take 11-5 to reach the playoffs, which is a tall order.

@49ers, @packers, 2 with the Saints, Seahawks, and @Colts will all be tough games - and that's assuming we avoid a stinker against the Falcons

Win 4 in a row and 2 out of our next 4 games are against crap teams with the next game being a 6-0 team who couldn’t put 10 points on the redskins... I hate to tell you, you have to win hard game to go to the super bowl... beat 49ers, titans, and falcons and lose in GB we start the season 7-3 with a matchup with the Saints that would almost be a must win if they don’t lose anytime soon... 8-4 if we lose that beat the falcons and redskins you’re 10-4...  that leaves Seattle and saints...we beat Seattle and are 11-4 at the finale, the question is did the saints go 12-3 at the very worst and have 1 division loss to make this interesting? Cam playing hurt vs Tampa has completely screwed us, but I’m not counting my cards for the wild card... anyone who thinks we are going to win 3 straight road games with Ron coaching is smoking. We gotta beat GB imo if we can’t win in NO, gotta go 2-1 over the @SF @NO and @GB stretch preferably with the win being in NO. If we beat the 9ers, GB, and Saints, our likely week 17 concern will be whether we’re gonna be the #1 or #2 seed. If cam is nowhere near ready, this is where Kyle would need to earn this job. Only on the huddle we’re debating wild card scenarios after winning 4 in a row after starting 0-2 due to a clearly injured QB playing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...