Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An Early Look at the Stats : Panthers vs 49ers


Pantha-kun

Recommended Posts

Went through the games and looked deeper and jotted some notes 

-keys for us.  Run CMC Run!!!

-hold onto that ball Kyle Allen

 

 

Outside of the Bengals game, who's OL has been a mess and cant run the ball on anyone 

 

Teams have been able to run the ball fairly easy on the 49ers.  But have just abandoned it and thats where they got in trouble

Ypc from RBs

Bucs- 5.14 

Steelers- had less than 4 But ran the ball less than 15 times

Browns- 5.4 

Rams- 4.64

Redskins- 4.16

 

All the teams seemed to have ran the ball well but didnt stick with it.  Didnt think a single team rushed the ball more than 25 times

 

When they didnt get the run game going, that meant they were passing and that front 4 is good.

They forced Atleast 1 fumble from the QB in every game(3 of the 6 games QBs fumbled twice), though many were recovered by the offense, still dont wont to risk it.

 

 

We matchup well with our playing style.  Kyle just needs to have a strong grip on that ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Went through the games and looked deeper and jotted some notes 

-keys for us.  Run CMC Run!!!

-hold onto that ball Kyle Allen

 

 

Outside of the Bengals game, who's OL has been a mess and cant run the ball on anyone 

 

Teams have been able to run the ball fairly easy on the 49ers.  But have just abandoned it and thats where they got in trouble

Ypc from RBs

Bucs- 5.14 

Steelers- had less than 4 But ran the ball less than 15 times

Browns- 5.4 

Rams- 4.64

Redskins- 4.16

 

All the teams seemed to have ran the ball well but didnt stick with it.  Didnt think a single team rushed the ball more than 25 times

 

When they didnt get the run game going, that meant they were passing and that front 4 is good.

They forced Atleast 1 fumble from the QB in every game(3 of the 6 games QBs fumbled twice), though many were recovered by the offense, still dont wont to risk it.

 

 

We matchup well with our playing style.  Kyle just needs to have a strong grip on that ball.

Interesting analysis. I was surprised that AP did as well as he did, especially in the begging of the game. The strength of our D is only rushing 4 and getting to the QB quickly, so yes, a heavy run game would be the way to attack us. 

The turnovers are almost a given for us now. It is truly amazing what they are able to do. Anytime you have a five step drop there will be an opportunity to put the ball on ground. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

My memory isnt as sharp as it once was. I remember shanahan calling great games and working the Panthers D each time. That was with a different group of players, especially at WR.... I believe the zone-blocking gives the panthers issues too, for sure shanahan has that element at SF. Just Coleman, Alexander, and shanahan have LOADS of experience against the panthers. Thats my main worry- SF will be ready. Just going to hope during the Bye Norv and Ron come up with a great game-plan, cause SF is for real and ready. Be like the old NFC west days type of game.. 

Well, how about some Kyle Shannhan/Panther fun facts 

Kyle was OC for 4 meetings 

Kyle’s offense never rushed for 100 yards in any game he faced Luke Kuechly.  The one game Luke missed his team topped 100. 

Shannahan offense was held to 0 points in first meeting.  Falcons offense wasn’t noteworthy IMO.    

Falcons gave Panthers there 1 loss in the 15-1 season (Cam’s baby game).   Team was just off and flat all around.  Falcons offense wasn’t impressive. Credit for a win though.  20 points. 

First matchup in 2016 was the game Bradberry got hurt on 2nd play.  Julio went for 300 yards vs Benwikere and ended his career here.  Credit Kyle for an in game adjustment and going at a wound...but that isn’t a game plan he can repeat.  Just throwing downfield to Julio with Bradberry out and an injured Bene on him all game.   I mean, he can’t go back to that tape and use it for the game. 

The Luke out with a concussion game was the best overall called game.  Falcons had balance. Took it to us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Gold Blooded said:

I guess we will have to agree to disagree, I don't think bookies set lines for the 'average better'

No, they set the lines (and adjust them if necessary) in order to attract equal action on both sides, thereby guaranteeing themselves a profit on the juice.  SF would be a 3 pt fav, if everybody considered the 2 teams even, just on home field "advantage."  The extra 2 1/2 points stem from SF's better record (which the "average bettor" would treat as fair.)

This is not an "overlay," which is making the wrong team the favorite, but I do think it'll be an upset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the refresher @CRA

That I tried to block out both the 15-1 and Juilo 300 yarder games, but didnt. I for sure didnt remember holding them to 0, brain let me down. That 15-1 was impressive cause Panthers where on the ride to unbeaten glory and no one thought the fing falcons had that in them. This years' panthers are no where close to those panthers teams run D, at one point they had not allowed a 100 yard rusher for like 20+ weeks in a row. It was rare for a team to have a big run gain, now pass defense is top tier(most part) and run D is weaker. That still can be fixed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...