Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An Early Look at the Stats : Panthers vs 49ers


Pantha-kun

Recommended Posts

Defense : 

  • Yards Per Game : Panthers 12th (344) // 49ers 1st (223.5) 
  • Passing Yards Per Game :  Panthers 7th (225) // 49ers 1st (133.5) 
  • Rushing Yards Per Game : Panthers 23rd (119) // 49ers  7th (Tied with Vikings) (90.0) 
  • Points Per Game : Panthers 15th (22.2) // 49ers 2nd (10.7) 
  • Total Sacks : Panthers 1st (27) / 49ers 5th (tied with 3 other teams) (20) 
  • Total INTs : Panthers 2nd (9) / 49ers 7th (7)(tied with Vikings) 
  • Turnover Differential : Panthers 3rd (tied with Green Bay) (+6) // 49ers  (+2)  

Offense  : 

  • Yards Per Game : Panthers 20th (353) // 49ers 7th (387.2) 
  • Passing Yards Per Game :  Panthers 22nd (223.5) // 49ers 25th (214.5) 
  • Passing Stats : Panthers 7 TD to 1 INT // 49ers 7 TD to 6 INT 
  • Rushing Yards Per Game : Panthers 9th (129.5) // 49ers 2nd (172.7) 
  • Points Per Game : Panthers 5th (27.7) // 49ers 11th (26) 

My Thoughts

Overall  Panthers won 6 catagories above, 49ers also won 6. Stats and eyeball test watching both teams this season indicate two teams who run the ball well and have good defenses. 49ers are better defensive yardage wise but we're much better at forcing turnovers.  

Game would probably be a tossup on a nuetral field and I'd give the atvantage to whoever is playing at home, which is the 49ers this time around. We should be able their toughest test in terms of wreaking havoc with a pass rush especially if either of their starting OTs are out again.  

This should defintely be a contest decided in the trenches. Keep the 49ers Dline off Allen and get to Garrapolo and keep forcing him into ill advised throws (ive seen some terrible INTs from him btw). 

49ers are undefeated but they aren't world beaters. Panthers are by far the toughest team they will have faced thus far, with their only legit win being against a Super Bowl hungover Rams team who only managed to just barely eek out a 3 point win vs a one footed Cam Newton in week 1.

I'm actually hoping all the talking heads pick against us Sunday, that usually seems to work in our favor for whatever reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 49ers look really good so this is a good comparison. 

The biggest concern I have in this game is Allen's ball security, their D-Line is no joke. 

Might be crazy to say but Butler might be our most important player this game. If he plays like he did the last game and shuts down the run game I think we take this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice post, sir.  You bring up a lot to discuss.

To me, the stats that will probably decide the game are Turnover-related.  In that area, especially INTs, we excel.  They don't force many, Allen (so far) doesn't throw them.  Jimmy G tosses it around carelessly, and we have a pass rush to harass him, and a secondary that knows how to pick them off.

If THOSE tendencies play out (and any past statistics are only good if they indicate a continuing trend), then we win.  Ball security is paramount in this, or any big game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can’t really say we won 6, they won 6 it’s even. Not how this should be looked at.

Have to look at just how far behind we are to them and them to us when a category is won.

And when you consider that, they are the superior team.

When 49ers win a category we’re an average 11 drops lower.

When the Panthers win a category it’s going to be somewhere around 6-8 drops lower. (San Fran is 14th in turnover diff but not sure about ‘passing stats’ category).

Not a humongous gap but with two winning teams there isn’t going to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two good defenses with heavy run games. I would guess that the team that doesn't allow turnovers and can gas their opponents D will win. Don't giveup turnovers and don't go 3 and out, we should be able to wear them down if we can keep that up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

49ers offense and defense are both superior to ours going into last week.  We've played better offenses and slightly better defenses so far.  Jimmy G is definitely their weak link though.

UPDATED:

Panthers are 17th in Offense, 5th in Defense.  49ers are 9th in offense, 2nd in defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jus Rob said:

We make then one dimensional and make Jimmy G beat us through the air. Kyle continues to play complimentary football. We win 21 to 10

This sounds very similar to how teams used to talk about the Panthers during the 15....take away Greg, and make the rest beat you.

Kyle (coach) is a very very good offensive mind, it may be a fun chess match between him and Ron.  I need to go back and look, but I don't think that we had a very good record vs. Shanny when he was in ATL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turnovers and scoring on short fields will be the difference in this game. 
 

also, the Panthers have been road warriors so I think it’s more even they are playing away.

its all about the turnovers and scoring on the short field. If we do what we’ve done to others and kill their drives with turnovers, coupled with scoring touchdowns on those turnovers then we win.

if Jimmy shows up and throws no picks and we can’t find a way to score then we have problems.

1st scenario we kill them—- with the turnovers and score— “ this is where we hold them! This is where THEY die! (300 reference just went over many heads)

2nd scenario happens and it’s a close One where we all have panic attacks until the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

This sounds very similar to how teams used to talk about the Panthers during the 15....take away Greg, and make the rest beat you.

Kyle (coach) is a very very good offensive mind, it may be a fun chess match between him and Ron.  I need to go back and look, but I don't think that we had a very good record vs. Shanny when he was in ATL.

Just gotta play contain on Cam and double Olsen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...