Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Cam be worried


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

The team looked like garbage today, officially handed NFCS to the Aints. Ron and Co are coaching for their jobs and the only way we get a WC is with Cam coming back.

Ron has been able to keep Cam on the sidelines thanks to the winning streak. I believe if Kyle was struggling and we had lost his first couple games Ron would’ve been pushing for Cam’s return.

So after today does Ron pressure Cam to take the field against a very good defense even though he might not be physically ready?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stankowalski said:

Dude...the Titans ain't the 49'ers.  If Cam is healthy you bring him back.

Most of what I've read suggests it'll be one more week.

But as to the question of whether he should be worried playing behind this offensive line, hell yes he should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Most of what I've read suggests it'll be one more week.

But as to the question of whether he should be worried playing behind this offensive line, hell yes he should.

The titans don't scare me nearly as much as the 49er's did.  We should be able to pass the ball at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

Best thing for Cam would be for this shitty coaching staff to get fired. Maybe he should actually take all this time to heal up and get a competent coaching staff in place for him to finish his career.

Best case scenario honestly. 
 

I’m not ready to move on from Cam until he at least gets one year with a new coach. It unfair to have Cam and Ron tied at the hip when Cam has made Ron look like good coach all these years. It’s like when LeBron carried Mike Brown to the finals in 2007. Only LeBron did the smart thing by leaving before Mike Brown and the Cleveland FO could do any further damage to Brons legacy and career 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFC south is handed to the saints when they can lose to Tampa (they haven’t swept them in 3 years) and us and we have the division lead going into the Washington game December 1st. Getting sick of this fanbase counting every hard road game or even hard home games as a loss. Asswhippings happen, patriots lost by 40 to KC and won a super bowl. We don’t have a qb with one arm, we’re not going to finish 4-12. Calm down. Only reason we lost Detroit was a off the mark pass that was wide open and a missed FG (thanks Gano) vs seattle. They win those we would’ve been 8-3, but with Cam hurt the wheels would’ve felll off, but might’ve cost ourselves Brian burns by winning those games anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pantherzack179812 said:

NFC south is handed to the saints when they can lose to Tampa (they haven’t swept them in 3 years) and us and we have the division lead going into the Washington game December 1st. Getting sick of this fanbase counting every hard road game or even hard home games as a loss. Asswhippings happen, patriots lost by 40 to KC and won a super bowl. We don’t have a qb with one arm, we’re not going to finish 4-12. Calm down. Only reason we lost Detroit was a off the mark pass that was wide open and a missed FG (thanks Gano) vs seattle. They win those we would’ve been 8-3, but with Cam hurt the wheels would’ve felll off, but might’ve cost ourselves Brian burns by winning those games anyway.

Hate to tell y’all, our team has won in NO before lol. If we can’t beat NO on the road, why are y’all so obsessed with wild card games? Literally nobody predicted this team to win more then half their road games in the preseason but they want us to get a wild card lol. I’d rather have the draft position. At least in 2014 we got one home game. Winning in Seattle and GB was more reasonable then winning 3 in the road.Even If we won that saints game in 2017, y’all really saw that team going to Minnesota then Philly and winning to get to SB 52?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sellers is absolutely one to keep an eye on. Could be the next Cam or could be the next Anthony Richardson. Curious to see how he has progressed come this fall.
    • I think Texas could go 0-12 and he would still go #1 based on his name and traits like you say.  But nusselman and sellers may be actually better qbs.    Man if bryce stinks it up this season its looking like a damn good year to swap out qbs.  Sellers highlights are just fuging jaw dropping
    • I mean, the kid comes from a wealthy family. It's not like he needs the money. He has a ton of potential now we get to see what he can do as a starter. Everyone penciling him in as the #1 overall pick is putting the cart way before the horse. It's 5% because of his talent and what he's showing on the field and 95% because his last name is Manning. And if he is what he's hyped to be the Texas coaching staff needs to be answering some tough questions about why the kid wasn't on the field sooner. Ewers was a good college QB but he's definitely not a "keep a future #1 overall pick waiting" type of college QB. Only getting one season out of a top NFL talent because you chose to keep him buried behind a borderline NFL talent is just coaching negligence. Not starting him as a true freshman? Yeah, I get that. But on year two if the kids is what he's hyped to be you gotta wish Ewers well elsewhere and turn the page.
×
×
  • Create New...