Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline News

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, t96 said:

Adams is cost controlled for the rest of this year and the next two years, and has proven he can play at a high level in the NFL and was a top 5 pick. I know he’s a safety but a later first rounder for him would be pretty damn solid value. I think they’ll want more and will get more, however.

Jeez...guess you dont see these premadonnas holding out for a bigger contract.  Control isnt what it used to be

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

But giving up a 2nd for 1/2 of a season of a guy that is getting old.  I just can't commit to.

I probably wouldn’t do it but let’s say that move was enough to get us wins against the Packers, Seahawks and Saints once, then into the playoffs to compete... Is that not worth a late 2nd? And it’s no guarantee he’d walk in the offseason. He could easily have 2-3 more elite years left in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why would Darnold be off limits? Damn, he's looked absolutely terrible this year.

He's young

He's  got potential 

He's looked bad the last 2 weeks but Good vs the Cowboys.  Missed most of rest of season to Mono

Plus hard to judge him with him OL killing him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...