Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB controversy is over


GoPanthers123

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GoPanthers123 said:

Carry on.  We got a tough schedule ahead and you are onboard with who we have, or if not then it’s because Ron has to go. Allen didn’t warrant any hate by any of his actions on or off the field.

Rooting against Allen makes no sense anymore.

When did it ever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be hard to hear... our best case is that Kyle Allen proves to be a serviceable starter so that we can cut cam and use his cap space on other positions. 

Outside of Brady the key to winning a super bowl is a good quarterback on a friendly deal. That’s not hyperbole that’s a fact 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

This may be hard to hear... our best case is that Kyle Allen proves to be a serviceable starter so that we can cut cam and use his cap space on other positions. 

Outside of Brady the key to winning a super bowl is a good quarterback on a friendly deal. That’s not hyperbole that’s a fact 

Why outside of Brady? He makes team friendly deals because his wife has 8-10 times his net worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 332nd said:

Why outside of Brady? He makes team friendly deals because his wife has 8-10 times his net worth.

This. One of the huge advantages the Pats have enjoyed with Brady is that he has constantly given them a very team friendly deal. He makes average to below average starting QB money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

The OP stated: QB controversy is over.

Based on today's events, not sure why anyone would choose to disagree (at least until the Allen vs. Grier debate heats up).

Speaking for myself, it's because I don't believe there was one.

I define a QB controversy as a team having to decide between two viable choices.

After week two, Newton was no longer a viable choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Speaking for myself, it's because I don't believe there was one.

I define a QB controversy as a team having to decide between two viable choices.

After week two, Newton was no longer a viable choice.

Well, until today, there was some hope that Cam would return at some point during the regular season.

That hope generated intense debate for many fans as to how and when Cam should reclaim his role as starting QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Well, until today, there was some hope that Cam would return at some point during the regular season.

That hope generated intense debate for many fans as to how and when Cam should reclaim his role as starting QB.

I don't think there ever really was any hope.

Now one key difference in terms here: I believe a quarterback controversy only happens within the confines of the team itself. If you're talking about a quarterback controversy among fans, that's another story. 

Also, you're a poo poo head :Eyes_Emoji_42x42:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 3 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ??      
    • Big game tonight. Please send the annoying ass bandwagon New York fans home sad
×
×
  • Create New...