Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talking Packers - What do you know?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I don't think we come out with a W, but it would not be the world's biggest upset if it happened.

On the downside, the Packers are a solid team, just got embarrassed in LA by the Chargers, and, after a bye, have another west coast game, this time against the 49ers.  They probably see this is a game they have to win.

On the upside, statistically it looks like a winnable game, the Chargers game plan seems like the kind of plan Rivera would execute (control the ball, keep the defense off the field, and grind away), and I don't think the Packers are as good as their record would indicate.  In other words, "they're good, but they ain't that good."

Then again, the 49ers are good, but they "ain't that good (51-13)" too.

Unfortunately, this is exactly the kind of game we have historically not win.  Rivera coached teams seem to do better against teams that we look like we have no chance to beat.  Games against good teams in which we may be underdogs but could beat worry me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All depends on if the Panthers can keep consistent pressure on Rodgers. I think they'll figure out how to contain the Packers' run game. They don't use misdirections to the degree the 49ers do. But Rodgers can carve you up if he's comfortable. Sacks are great, but it isn't enough. Could get 7 or 8 sacks and still get beaten pretty bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Blowout incoming and the wheels fall off. Parsons will have multiple sacks, prob a FF. Media immediately starts saying the Bryce era is over 
    • It's worth noting that we started playing something that looked like football after going down 17-0 against the Dolphins.  Up to that point we had rushed the ball 3 times and Bryce had two turnovers.   Then we ran it 5 straight times with Rico and he started cracking off some big gains and led to our first touchdown.  Another 37 yards of rushing later, Bryce goes 1 yard complete, incomplete, incomplete to get that field goal before halftime.  Then we committed big time to the run in the second half and played some really nice complimentary football.  The Panthers had stumbled on a formula, and it started with Rico being crazy productive.  Something they only learned because Chubba was injured and Bryce started that game so poorly they were forced to lean on Rico. Fast foward to Dallas, they essentially lean into the same game plan against the Cowboys and I think everyone was surprised by how quickly it started to look complimentary.  In my opinion the productive offense really helped the defense as well.  We played quite solid against a top offense. Finally we make our way to the Jets and Bills, Chubba's return.  You can't say the low scoring affair and return to ineffective football against the Jets was all on Chubba, they were indeed a better defense and so was Buffalo.  But the production difference between the two backs in both games was both visually and statistically obvious.  The bigger picture is the offense took a major step back as well.  They are other moving parts and it's isn't all one thing, BY9>Dalton by a decent margin at this point.   But yeah, Rico's vision and athleticism is just better than Chubba and it jumps at you.
×
×
  • Create New...