Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At 5-5


Snake

Recommended Posts

We just suffered another NFC L. We aren't making the playoffs. We would literally have to sweep the Falcons (which I don't even think we'll do), sweep the Saints (yeah right), and/or beat the Seahawks (Wilson is going to murder this sorry excuse for a defense). Not gonna happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

We are basically not making the playoffs. We need to either sweep the Saints and the rest of the division or sweep everyone else and win one game against the Saints. In other words the odds are not good. 

 

We lost to the Rams, SF and GB. All of them are contenders in the NFC. What makes you think we can beat NO twice. I bet you my paycheck that we lose to Atlanta this weekend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

We lost to the Rams, SF and GB. All of them are contenders in the NFC. What makes you think we can beat NO twice. I bet you my paycheck that we lose to Atlanta this weekend

Sherlock he just said were not making the  playoffs your not that bright you want to be a big bad edge lord troll that you  can't even comprehend what the TC posted.

 

He doesn't think we can beat the saints.... he said the odds are not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ZoneRead said:

Sherlock he just said were not making the  playoffs your not that bright you want to be a big bad edge lord troll that you  can't even comprehend what the TC posted.

 

He doesn't think we can beat the saints.... he said the odds are not good.

Why would you guys root for mediocrity? That’s how the poor stays poor and the rich gets rich 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bull123 said:

San Fran and Green Bay gonna win their divisions

rams lost to Pitt today

we have 4 losses with 7 games left (Tampa game still haunts us)

I’m saying 10 wins gets us in..5-2 rest of the way

at Green Bay in nov was always gonna be tough

we have to beat Atlanta, New Orleans, and Seattle as always 

we usually lose those games...maybe not this year

i say we go to Indy with a real shot in week before last

 

If they can manage to sweep ATL, beat the Saints once, and beat the Seahawks, then we still have a pretty good chance. Rams still have to play the Bears, Ravens, Seahawks, Cowboys, and 49ers again. That is one hard ass schedule I can definitely see 3 losses for them there. We can beat them out for a wildcard spot at 10-6. Not getting my hopes up though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...