Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At 5-5

Snake

By Snake,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted

We just suffered another NFC L. We aren't making the playoffs. We would literally have to sweep the Falcons (which I don't even think we'll do), sweep the Saints (yeah right), and/or beat the Seahawks (Wilson is going to murder this sorry excuse for a defense). Not gonna happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Forty-Eight Newbie

Forty-Eight

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Snake said:

We are basically not making the playoffs. We need to either sweep the Saints and the rest of the division or sweep everyone else and win one game against the Saints. In other words the odds are not good. 

 

We lost to the Rams, SF and GB. All of them are contenders in the NFC. What makes you think we can beat NO twice. I bet you my paycheck that we lose to Atlanta this weekend

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ZoneRead Enthusiast

ZoneRead

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

We lost to the Rams, SF and GB. All of them are contenders in the NFC. What makes you think we can beat NO twice. I bet you my paycheck that we lose to Atlanta this weekend

Sherlock he just said were not making the  playoffs your not that bright you want to be a big bad edge lord troll that you  can't even comprehend what the TC posted.

 

He doesn't think we can beat the saints.... he said the odds are not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Forty-Eight Newbie

Forty-Eight

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ZoneRead said:

Sherlock he just said were not making the  playoffs your not that bright you want to be a big bad edge lord troll that you  can't even comprehend what the TC posted.

 

He doesn't think we can beat the saints.... he said the odds are not good.

Why would you guys root for mediocrity? That’s how the poor stays poor and the rich gets rich 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, bull123 said:

San Fran and Green Bay gonna win their divisions

rams lost to Pitt today

we have 4 losses with 7 games left (Tampa game still haunts us)

I’m saying 10 wins gets us in..5-2 rest of the way

at Green Bay in nov was always gonna be tough

we have to beat Atlanta, New Orleans, and Seattle as always 

we usually lose those games...maybe not this year

i say we go to Indy with a real shot in week before last

 

If they can manage to sweep ATL, beat the Saints once, and beat the Seahawks, then we still have a pretty good chance. Rams still have to play the Bears, Ravens, Seahawks, Cowboys, and 49ers again. That is one hard ass schedule I can definitely see 3 losses for them there. We can beat them out for a wildcard spot at 10-6. Not getting my hopes up though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...