Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Reid should be cut immediately


tukafan21

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

They have their meetings and walk through in the morning and then have all day until they check in to team hotel at night. Are you just making poo up here?

The tweet said he was "back in plenty of time for meetings"...this after attending the workout in Atlanta. 

If there's a timeline you can provide which would explain that I'm certainly open to hearing about it. 

It doesn't say he was "back in time to check into the team hotel"....

It doesn't say "in order to attend the workout he flew down to Atlanta after participating in the Panthers standard Saturday morning meetings and walk-through"....

Your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SBiii said:

The tweet said he was "back in plenty of time for meetings"...this after attending the workout in Atlanta. 

If there's a timeline you can provide which would explain that I'm certainly open to hearing about it. 

It doesn't say he was "back in time to check into the team hotel"....

It doesn't say "in order to attend the workout he flew down to Atlanta after participating in the Panthers standard Saturday morning meetings and walk-through"....

Your thoughts?

My thoughts are they have their  meetings and walkthroughs in the morning. Then they have a check in at night. They might have a meeting then. If you have any info to suggest he missed check in let's hear it. Until then you are making poo up to stir the pot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ARSEN said:

This thread needs to be locked.  Stupid thread is stupid.

the first several pages are pretty good tbh lmao. mod action was taken regarding the kerfuffle of the last couple pages, if there's more badness when i get up in the morning i'll lock it then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

I mean, just think. It is for the good of the team. Reid can go and personally observe and come back and tell Hurney and Tepper how much better he is than Allen. That is helping right?

Or just maybe he was supporting a friend. I know outlandish idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...