Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know it's depressing, but lets talk about draft eligible QBs


Verge

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Talking about simplistic thinking...which defies actual professional information and prognoses...

This opinion certainly shouldn't be discounted. 

The Huddle certainly is not a doctor's office, nor the stuff made of Las Vegas sports books.

I will leave the medical opinions to the experts, and I stand by what I said until Tua's prognosis does a 180 turn towards the negative; you can't take him off your list, and his name must be highlighted---as in a priority of needed due diligence due to our current situation at QB.

It's a fair question though.

Would it be wise to move on from a quarterback with injury concerns by replacing him with another quarterback who has injury concerns?

If those concerns manifest, you've potentially set yourself back for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's a fair question though.

Would it be wise to move on from a quarterback with injury concerns by replacing him with another quarterback who has injury concerns?

If those concerns manifest, you've potentially set yourself back for years.

Not to mention, if you are trying to make that gamble early(first round) why wouldn't you just make the gamble on a former league MVP? 

Tua to us just doesn't make a lot of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Not to mention, if you are trying to make that gamble early(first round) why wouldn't you just make the gamble on a former league MVP? 

Tua to us just doesn't make a lot of sense.

Tua isn't the only option though.

Flipside of your scenario: Gamble a year on Cam and he gets hurt again, you potentially just missed a chance to get a franchise quarterback to replace him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Tua isn't the only option though.

Flipside of your scenario: Gamble a year on Cam and he gets hurt again, you potentially just missed a chance to get a franchise quarterback to replace him.

Yeah but the scenario we are talking about IS Tua. Hence my reasoning against taking him. 

 

As for the other scenario, that applies every year. Every year you don't take a QB, you potentially miss on a franchise QB. That math never changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah but the scenario we are talking about IS Tua. Hence my reasoning against taking him. 

As for the other scenario, that applies every year. Every year you don't take a QB, you potentially miss on a franchise QB. That math never changes.

The math doesn't always involve gambling on an injured starter though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2019 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy Igo said:

Hurney had him as a top 3 QB in the draft. 

And the very reason why I question his drafting prowess...actually the lack thereof.  Hurney is good at pro talent evaluation of players, but sucks at projecting college talent at the next level.  That's the reason he does so well in free agency, but leaves me banging my head against the wall every April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Not to mention, if you are trying to make that gamble early(first round) why wouldn't you just make the gamble on a former league MVP? 

Tua to us just doesn't make a lot of sense.

What would the gamble on Cam look like?  That is the question.

If Cam won't play under his current deal, that means that you have to sign him to a new deal that pays him what he wants to be paid....likely top 10 QB money, if not top 5.

Now, lets look at the $$$, as that's whats important as we ender a rebuilding phase.

Cam's deal would likely average about 29-30M per year over the first 2, at least.

Tua, if drafted at say....15, would be about 2.6-4M over his first few years.

Cam would possibly sign a Jimmy G type contract, but that is essentially around 30M per year over the 1st 2 seasons, then is able to be cut with little cap impact.

So the gamble, is bet on Cam to get and stay completely healthy, and for the new front office to put a decent team around him so that we can make it to the playoffs at least once, if not twice over those two seasons.  Or bet on Tua getting healthy, and being a good NFL QB, while allowing his LOW salary to allow you to build a good team around him like we should have done with Cam as a rookie.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thefuzz said:

What would the gamble on Cam look like?  That is the question.

If Cam won't play under his current deal, that means that you have to sign him to a new deal that pays him what he wants to be paid....likely top 10 QB money, if not top 5.

Now, lets look at the $$$, as that's whats important as we ender a rebuilding phase.

Cam's deal would likely average about 29-30M per year over the first 2, at least.

Tua, if drafted at say....15, would be about 2.6-4M over his first few years.

Cam would possibly sign a Jimmy G type contract, but that is essentially around 30M per year over the 1st 2 seasons, then is able to be cut with little cap impact.

So the gamble, is bet on Cam to get and stay completely healthy, and for the new front office to put a decent team around him so that we can make it to the playoffs at least once, if not twice over those two seasons.  Or bet on Tua getting healthy, and being a good NFL QB, while allowing his LOW salary to allow you to build a good team around him like we should have done with Cam as a rookie.

 

I'm not talking about Cam on a new deal, I'm talking about Cam on his current deal. If he doesn't want to play under that contract, then the decision is basically already made for the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I think you are really just inventing scenarios that I was not talking about at all. My point was that taking Tua over Cam makes zero sense. 

I don't disagree with you on that.

48 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I'm not talking about Cam on a new deal, I'm talking about Cam on his current deal. If he doesn't want to play under that contract, then the decision is basically already made for the Panthers.

That's what people have been hearing that leads them to believe he won't be back though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...