Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scarlett to IR


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Just now, TheRed said:

So basically confirmed now that we are going to run CMC into the ground in a losing season.

Not a good sign for a future contract if he's all used up and beat up by the time negotiations begin.

He's the 3rd RB so really nothing has changed. (they're still going to run CMC into the ground)

This sounds like they need another OL more than a 4th RB on the roster, to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not sure what happened or when...

Some folks had high hopes for him in preseason but ya know how it goes.

Hurney wasted a draft pick on him to sit on the bench behind CMC.  He went to IR with an infected wound on his a$$ suffered from a splinter incident riding the pine all season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Hurney wasted a draft pick on him to sit on the bench behind CMC.  He went to IR with an infected wound on his a$$ suffered from a splinter incident riding the pine all season.

Not that I'd ever defend Hurney, but to be fair it's the coaches who decide who plays and who doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

no, that's the point. Plus it seems like they want to give Davis a possible look. So this is just a end of the season dump to get OL help on the active roster. 

Remember when we cut Anderson to get a better look at CAP? LOL!

I suspect it's simply that Davis is the better STer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...