Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adjustments


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Other teams do them. Us, not so much.

The Redskins adjusted both their offensive and defensive approaches during this game, and effectively so.

If we responded, I missed it.

We did respond...

we let them score 29 unanswered points. I thought that’s what great teams do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

We did respond...

we let them score 29 unanswered points. I thought that’s what great teams do

You're meant to sit on an 11 point lead in the very first quarter. Don't you know the Rivera HC playbook.

Also if your defense is getting destroyed and they have a rookie QB who has shown 0 ability to throw the ball to beat any team you play your DBs 30 miles off the LOS and for sure you don't stack the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I have to admit that even with the previous letdowns and everything, I really really didn't believe we'd lose today.

This one hurt, a lot.

I am just glad we don’t have the Bengals on the schedule.  Coming into today, I thought the Redskins were only second to them on the futility scale. 

Of course, the Falcons were on that Radar scope a few weeks ago, too.

Right now, I am convinced we could lose to anyone. 

And to the original point, let's just say making adjustments during the game, at halftime, or even between games is not a trademark of a Ron Rivera coached team.  We do what we do, and if it is ineffective, we do more of it and expect different results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...