Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Video: Rhule leaning 4-3 on defense


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Lets not forget

Rhule has always talked about mismatches even if it means moving people around.  

A few people including one of the ESPN draft heads thought Burns Could play a 4-3 OLB.

 

Anthony Barr, is Very similar to Burns coming out.  Was a 3-4 OLB in college, and has been a Stud as a OLB in Minnesota's 4-3.

That is what I was thinking--instead of beefing him up, have him drop 10 and take Davis' old gig.  Not sure if he has that skill set, which is why I am asking instead of pretending to know everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

Huddlers notoriously have no idea what's going on around the league

They think Cody Ford and Star were tearing it up in Buffalo

 

Not sure if you were referring to how Dillard did.  But he has been bad all season. I watch the Eagles with my dad still a huge fan.  Dude was bad. 

He got benched later in the season. He still a rookie but it does look like NCfan and Linville were right about him.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

Huddlers notoriously have no idea what's going on around the league

They think Cody Ford and Star were tearing it up in Buffalo

 

Do all of your posts have an underlying theme of "I so smart, everyone else so dumb"?  Just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

Burns, Haynes, Christian Miller, Irvin, etc are all better off in 34

We were 2nd in the NFL in sacks

It's much easier and cheaper to fix run defense than finding pash rushers;  this is dumb

 

you don't build a defense around haynes, miller, and irvin. they're irrelevant to the argument at hand.

if burns can be converted without dropoff it's a no-brainer. the rest of our personnel is very well suited to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

you don't build a defense around haynes, miller, and irvin. they're irrelevant to the argument at hand.

if burns can be converted without dropoff it's a no-brained. the rest of our personnel is very well suited to it.

Exactly right. 

Rhule has a 7 year contract. It takes time to turn a barge. 

I plan on treating this team much like an expansion team now with low expectations and excitement for what is being built. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

 

Baylor is a Baptist school.

Looked it up though. His dad is a Nazarene minister.

This thing just went full circle---it is all starting to make sense.  Temple was founded by a Baptist minister....Apologies about the alter boy comments.  I misspoke. :liar:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...