Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBA Update (doesn't sound positive)


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

The reduction of contact in TC and practices has absolutely effected the defenses in recent years. We're seeing poor form, leading to injuries and poor effectiveness of defenses. Sure, it results in big plays and higher scores, but football being a game where 30+ points from both teams is just going to be laughable. It'll turn into the NBA. The mark of a good defense is consistently holding teams under 21 because scoring 3 TDs is SUPPOSED to be hard. If you score 3 TDs and a couple field goals, you should win. Defenses can't practice stopping an offense when they mentally have to turn on the ability to be an absolute animal on Sundays. That's a tough ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Further reductions to training camp contact? :thinking:

My money for the 'further reductions to training camp contact' point is that's just there to make the negotiation easier for the Players Association. That's one of the built-in "We can live without this if you provide [modification to the drug policy, etc]"

You go into the negotiation fighting for more than you expect to get, knowing some things will end up needing to be dropped to get something else.

But if the NFL accepts it, the players would gladly take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

Glad the players have a union that's standing up for them. Can't have football without the football players. This sport has been skewed too far in favor of ownership for too long. 

Unions are good and I’m glad for them too. We should have more of them in this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

The sport continues to evolve and the players union is playing a significant role in that process.

The current NFL may appear as antiquated for fans 50 years from now as leather helmets do for fans today..

Wouldn't surprise me. The more info that comes out on CTE the worse it looks. I think anyone and everyone always knew that repeated blows to the head weren't a great thing, but I don't think many thought it was going to end up looking as bad as it seems like it's ultimately going to turn out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...