Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

32 teams would've loved to sign Joe Brady


(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Recommended Posts

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

32 teams were not looking to hire an OC. Perhaps his decision had more to do with this being his perceived best situation of the available opening than a single factor that suits your preferred narrative.

No. We have certainty at the QB position. Or Brady would have went to a place with more certainty.

You don't have uncertainty, yet land arguably the hottest coaching prospect available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

But 32 teams! We have certainty at the Qb position! Cause someone on a msg board said so!

Granted, but I feel fairly certain that the Chiefs, among others, are fairly happy with their current offensive coordinator.

Mind you, I have seen some people asking why we and others didn't hire Eric Bieniemy as our head coach. Given how things played out, that's probably a valid question.

(I just hope it isn't still a valid question a few years from now)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

No. We have certainty at the QB position. Or Brady would have went to a place with more certainty.

You don't have uncertainty, yet land arguably the hottest coaching prospect available.

You know, I might be more inclined to agree with you if you didn’t take a single context clue and loudly declare it proves with absolute certainty something that might be true, or might not, but that we both know you couldn’t possibly know for sure, but enjoy pretending you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...