Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

32 teams would've loved to sign Joe Brady


(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Recommended Posts

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

32 teams were not looking to hire an OC. Perhaps his decision had more to do with this being his perceived best situation of the available opening than a single factor that suits your preferred narrative.

No. We have certainty at the QB position. Or Brady would have went to a place with more certainty.

You don't have uncertainty, yet land arguably the hottest coaching prospect available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

But 32 teams! We have certainty at the Qb position! Cause someone on a msg board said so!

Granted, but I feel fairly certain that the Chiefs, among others, are fairly happy with their current offensive coordinator.

Mind you, I have seen some people asking why we and others didn't hire Eric Bieniemy as our head coach. Given how things played out, that's probably a valid question.

(I just hope it isn't still a valid question a few years from now)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

No. We have certainty at the QB position. Or Brady would have went to a place with more certainty.

You don't have uncertainty, yet land arguably the hottest coaching prospect available.

You know, I might be more inclined to agree with you if you didn’t take a single context clue and loudly declare it proves with absolute certainty something that might be true, or might not, but that we both know you couldn’t possibly know for sure, but enjoy pretending you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...