Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Love could be the third QB taken in draft, this could get us calls for a trade down.


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

This could be very interesting if this goes down which could field calls to trade out of the 7 spot or maybe even consideration to drafting Herbert?

Utah State quarterback Jordan Love has been getting a lot of buzz after a strong performance at the Scouting Combine.

Love looked the part at 6-foot-4 and 224 pounds, and he worked out well enough that there’s increasing chatter that he may be the third-best quarterback in the draft, behind LSU’s Joe Burrow and Alabama’s Tua Tagovailoa. Dave Hyde of the South Florida Sun Sentinel suggests that Love could be the Dolphins’ target with the fifth overall pick if Burrow and Tagovailoa are both gone before then.

Oregon quarterback Justin Herbert has usually been named as the No. 3 quarterback on the board, but Love may be giving Herbert a run for his money.

Love decided to forego his senior season at Utah State after throwing for 3,402 yards, with 20 touchdowns, 17 interceptions and a 61.9 percent completion rate, as a junior in 2019. His numbers don’t scream “Top 5 pick,” but some teams may think he is.

Another article: Love for Jordan Love. I stopped in my tracks walking by a TV on Thursday night, hearing NFL Network’s Marc Ross saying of Utah State quarterback Jordan Love, “His potential far exceeds Tua.” So I found Ross, 11 years a top personnel executive with the Giants, and asked for an explanation.

“If you actually watch Jordan on tape, watch the traits he has, the playmaking ability, the innate feel for the game, the feel for the pocket, the poise, that will transfer well to the NFL,” Ross said. “When you would watch him every game, there were those ‘oh my gosh’ plays that you just have to keep rewinding . . . I have been banging his drum for a while saying that he was my second favorite guy. When you watch Utah State and Jordan Love’s cast, he was under siege every play, just about. With Tua, or Joe Burrow, they have layup plays where the scheme, the protection’s there, there’s a wide receiver open every time.

“Jordan Love didn’t have any layups in his offense. He’s got these receivers who will be nowhere close to NFL receivers who are tightly covered. He has to overcome all that on every play. Whereas, the Tuas and Joe Burrows, they just really have to make five or six tough plays a game, three-pointers. Jordan Love, every play for him is a three-pointer, or beating his man off the dribble to try to score.”

30ECBFBF-96F0-4281-AC76-9F08C72B2ABA.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think he would be in contention for our pick? I personally don’t want a QB picked this year. I would like both interior lines boasted this year. Saying this, I wouldn’t be shocked to see Hurney make this pick..Jordan Love seems like a wild card type pick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, raz said:

if love is there i think you take him, then beef up the interior OL in rds 2-4, then bpa.

I think love will end up being a very good QB but man that would be hard to take knowing Brown, Simmons, Okudah and any OT we want would be available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask yourself if you were at pick 7 in the 2011 draft, a comparable level of top talent, would you trade out of 7 to a mid round pick? I can’t say that I would.

In fact, Cleveland forewent Julio Jones at 6th in 2011 and took Phil Taylor later that round, Greg Little in round 2, Owen Marecic in round 4, Brandon Weeden the next year in round 1, and a 4th round pick used to trade up for Trent Richardson.

We aren’t the Browns, but would you have rolled the dice on that instead of just taking Julio Jones? In my opinion there’s no way we should trade down in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ship said:

Ask yourself if you were at pick 7 in the 2011 draft, a comparable level of top talent, would you trade out of 7 to a mid round pick? I can’t say that I would.

Depends on what you do with the picks.

Do you grab Cam Jordan, and two starters in the 2nd since we didn't have a 2nd round pick since Marty Hurney is an idiot and traded our 2nd rounder the year before of a QB out of App State?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love could be the next Mahomes or the next Rosen or Kizer. Wouldn’t want him at 7 and don’t think he’d be a reason for a team to overpay us to trade up to our spot. I think we should stand pat and take BPA. Regardless of position. We need help everywhere except RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, t96 said:

Love could be the next Mahomes or the next Rosen or Kizer. Wouldn’t want him at 7 and don’t think he’d be a reason for a team to overpay us to trade up to our spot. I think we should stand pat and take BPA. Regardless of position. We need help everywhere except RB.

Not much on drafting a LB at 7, but I can see Marty pulling the trigger....but I agree, we need help at every single position group not named runningback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Depends on what you do with the picks.

Do you grab Cam Jordan, and two starters in the 2nd since we didn't have a 2nd round pick since Marty Hurney is an idiot and traded our 2nd rounder the year before of a QB out of App State?

Look at my edit about Cleveland. I’m not saying we can’t make it work but I don’t like the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ship said:

Look at my edit about Cleveland. I’m not saying we can’t make it work but I don’t like the risk.

Oh, it's certainly a risk, but the 11 draft just happened to be one where I could justify the trade back because of how deep that draft was, I think this is just as good of a draft, but maybe not as top heavy as that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Ship said:

Ask yourself if you were at pick 7 in the 2011 draft, a comparable level of top talent, would you trade out of 7 to a mid round pick? I can’t say that I would.

In fact, Cleveland forewent Julio Jones at 6th in 2011 and took Phil Taylor later that round, Greg Little in round 2, Owen Marecic in round 4, Brandon Weeden the next year in round 1, and a 4th round pick used to trade up for Trent Richardson.

We aren’t the Browns, but would you have rolled the dice on that instead of just taking Julio Jones? In my opinion there’s no way we should trade down in this draft.

Those years the Browns made every mistake possible even when they didn’t move at all. Using them as an example is bad because they did literally make every bad move they could regardless of where they picked. I laugh when people try to equate why you don’t rebuild with we don’t want to be the Browns because they were so bad at drafting it was comical.

For giggles, they had 9 1st round picks from 2011-2016, this is what they got:

Mingo, Johnny Football, Richardson, Weeden, Phil Taylor, Danny Shelton, Cameron Erving, Justin Gilbert and Corey Coleman.

They literally got nothing out of 9 first rounders in 6 years. 4 of the 9 didn’t even get to their 4th year in the NFL. Not did they want to extend the 5th year option, almost half their picks didn’t even last long enough in the NFL to be considered for a 5th year. 4 of 9 were gone before they finished their rookie deal. The last one played 4 years with them and is out of the NFL. Lol, it’s still funny to think that 1 of their 9 first rounders made it to the end of his rookie deal and then he didn’t even play another down in the NFL. Pretty sure those 6 years are the worst 6 years of 1st round picks ever assembled and it’s not close, which is why trying to compare anyone to the Browns is a bad idea.

By the way, I do agree on not trading down. I want a stud and pick 7 is all but guaranteed a stud. Trade down and your risk increases. I think this looks like a really good draft but I want a stud and then just make good picks at 38 and 69 and we should have a good draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Free agency lurks.  It could be that Cincy signs Bridgewater, for example---would that not shake up the universe?  I am throwing in some HILARIOUS puns for your enjoyment, since we all can say that we love puns.

Teams we KNOW need a QB (pre-free agency): 

  • Bengals Prolly going with the donkey--(Burrow--they get better)
  • Dolphins--Most have one dorsal fin, but these Dolphins want Tua
  • Chargers--Are they in Love with Herbert, or are they in Love with Love?
  • Indy--If only Luck retired a year earlier, I could make an Indiana (Daniel) Jones pun, but I will go with, "Man(ning), the Colts are out of Luck; looking for some new guy to Eason into the job."  (seriously, I see them going after Herbert or Love)

Teams that MIGHT need a QB (pre-free agency) enough to draft one in round 1 and are in position to move up for one: 

  • Detroit--rumors abound that they are ready to move on from Stafford--are they lion? (cringe)
  • Bucs trying to kick the Winston habit--and this kind of cancer has no crab legs (that one was deep, requiring a knowledge of the tobacco industry and the Zodiac)
  • Las Vegas:  What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas--especially when you lose your Carr.  (Could the Raiders roll the dice on a new signal caller?)
  • Jacksonville: They have a Gardner, now all they need is water for their crops to grow--Bridgewater?

No more HILARIOUS puns:

Detroit is the wild card team that could change this draft entirely.  I think they trade out.

Bridgewater wild card free agent.  Where he goes could change the draft.

This is why keeping Cam right now is smart--it takes away your desperation and gives you options.  At the moment, Indy #13, Tampa Bay #14 seem to be in the QB market--they will have to move up.  However, Jacksonville at #9 could be interesting.

Let's say that Burrow, Tua, and Love are gone by #6.  There will be teams going after Herbert.  Keeping Cam allows the Panthers to have a bidding war---I imagine--if Indy or Tampa Bay start bidding, we are looking at a first rounder in 2020 and maybe a first in 2021.  We have a healthy Cam Newton, can draft someone like Jeudy, Kinlaw, or MLB Murray--a player said to have patterned his game after Luke--and then you have 2 first rounders to get into the QB hunt in 2021 should you let Cam go then.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...