Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

I don't see where it says they are developing symptoms again, only that they tested positive. Pretty important distinction.

I'll have to look again, but whichever source I read earlier specifically said they were developing symptoms again, because when I read it, it seemed pretty troubling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I'll have to look again, but whichever source I read earlier specifically said they were developing symptoms again, because when I read it, it seemed pretty troubling.

Same thing happened in China a couple weeks ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 4Corners said:

USA now leads the world in Coronavirus deaths. 
 

also, Happy Easter to everyone. I hope you are your family are safe. 

China does, but they're hiding their real death numbers from the rest of the world. But I've also heard rumors from social media that hospitals are marking non-Corona related deaths as Corona related deaths. Something about the more deaths they have the more federal aid they'll receive. Something like that. Wouldn't surprise me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

China does, but they're hiding their real death numbers from the rest of the world. But I've also heard rumors from social media that hospitals are marking non-Corona related deaths as Corona related deaths. Something about the more deaths they have the more federal aid they'll receive. Something like that. Wouldn't surprise me. 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

giphy.gif

When your government says all coronavirus related expenses would be paid by government, you put it past some places to tag treatments as coronavirus to make sure they get paid?

Edited by stirs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

giphy.gif

Really? That causes for a tin-foil hat gif? Wait, are saying that China hiding their real number of deaths is the conspiracy theory or that hospitals maybe putting down COD is COVID-19 when it really isn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

Really? That causes for a tin-foil hat gif? Wait, are saying that China hiding their real number of deaths is the conspiracy theory or that hospitals maybe putting down COD is COVID-19 when it really isn't?

You should be proud of that tin foil hat!!! Wear it with pride as your fellow nerds are currently broadcasting.wizard of oz steam GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

But I've also heard rumors from social media that hospitals are...

You're really not seeing how that's tinfoil hat worthy?

What was the illuminati's involvement? I heard COVID-19 started was brought here on those flying saucers at Area 51. I think the cure is sasquatch spit.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

You're really not seeing how that's tinfoil hat worthy?

From CNN, A 17-year-old dude died in California, his death was listed as COVID-19. After an investigation, it was determined his death was actually caused by septic shock, and now his death has been removed from the COVID-19 fatality list. Still tinfoil hat worthy?

This has already happened. Whose to say it hasn't happened elsewhere? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

From CNN, A 17-year-old dude died in California, his death was listed as COVID-19. After an investigation, it was determined his death was actually caused by septic shock, and now his death has been removed from the COVID-19 fatality list. Still tinfoil hat worthy?

This has already happened. Whose to say it hasn't happened elsewhere? 

So, they made an incorrect determination on his death initially then there was an investigation and it was corrected? That's your spike the football proof of widespread conspiracy on the mislabeling of deaths? LOL! Okay...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...