Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

They ramped up production of masks.  

Good.

 

4 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

I like that answer and I agree.

There needs to be other requirements that are guidelines like osha stuff where places that are frequented like grocery stores and pharmacies to protect the public and the workers. They need to be audited like regular but with these new guidelines in place.

also those that can do their jobs from home remain home. I’ve already read stories of companies requiring workers to come back to work when they can easily do their jobs from home. 
 

this is just a handful of things off the top of my head. This should be the new normal going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

Working from home will be fine until employers catch on to all the nonsense their employees are doing while they are supposed to be "working".  

As long as they’re getting the job done who cares. This is a pandemic.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, TheRumGone said:

As long as they’re getting the job done who cares. This is a pandemic.

Bingo. The majority of the people working from home are likely salaried anyway. As long as the job is getting done, who cares?

It's not like there isn't a ton of time wasted in a typical office setting with small talk and interruptions from coworkers anyway.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
motocross_cat Community Regular

motocross_cat

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

As long as they’re getting the job done who cares. This is a pandemic.

Should add this does not apply to everyone.  However I'm seeing alot of people posting things on their social media showing them partying it up on tuesday with captions like " ha ha omg work life".  I mean how stupid can you be.  

Edited by motocross_cat
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

Should add this does not apply to everyone.  However I'm seeing alot of people posting things on their social media showing them partying it up on tuesday with captions like " ha ha omg work life".  I mean how stupid can you be.  

Yeah, it's stupid but again... as long as the job is getting done, who cares?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, Icege said:

What is the acceptable death rate to institute shelter-in-place practices?

Also, is it the death rate or total number of deaths that matters?

There's no black and white answers there. We constantly have infectious diseases circulating in our population that WILL result in deaths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

There's no black and white answers there. We constantly have infectious diseases circulating in our population that WILL result in deaths.

Thought this was the TB thread and edited it since that seemed the more appropriate CV thread for the question

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Thought this was the TB thread and edited it since that seemed the more appropriate CV thread for the question

I thought it was a fair question. I mean, we are basically trying to strike a balance between managing loss of life and managing economic devastation. I'm not sure there is a clear cut right or wrong answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I thought it was a fair question. I mean, we are basically trying to strike a balance between managing loss of life and managing economic devastation. I'm not sure there is a clear cut right or wrong answer.

Works for me. Putting it back then

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bingo. The majority of the people working from home are likely salaried anyway. As long as the job is getting done, who cares?

It's not like there isn't a ton of time wasted in a typical office setting with small talk and interruptions from coworkers anyway.

I remember when I had my first review as a salaried employee.  Back then I had a nice little side gig after work, so I had to run errands and stuff during my lunch hour, which meant my lunch hour sometimes ended up being 90 minutes or more.  My Senior Manager brought this up to the Vice President (who does the review) and the VP said "well is he getting his job done?"  The Senior Manager said yes.  The VP said "so why does it matter?"  Then moved on to the next thing on the list. LOL

My mom's job got "sent home" by a supervisor that didn't like her.  She thought it would end badly for my mom, but my mom loved working from home so it backfired.  But my mom was still hourly, and the supervisor was "worried" that she wasn't actually working the entire day.  As you said, she wouldn't have been working for every dollar if she were at the office, so as long as she does her job...who cares?  The supervisor changed her pay structure, and instead of paying her hourly she found a way to pay her for what she produced.  This also backfired, because my mom was able to get an entire day's worth of production done in half of a day, so she picked up side work and made more money than she ever did working in the office.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Panther53521
      Daniel Jeremiah mocks KC Concepcion to the #Panthers 👏👏👏

      By Panther53521 · Posted

      I am ok with him as a pick, but not at 19.
    • Khyber53
      First Round Poll: Position Drafted

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      I want something else, but I've got to say I think we grab an OT in the first. We are looking at future issues at OT on both sides of the line after this season (and that's IF there are no further injuries). If Icky can come back, he's going to be somewhat expensive. Moton is winding down his career (and I hate to see him go, but his cost vs value curve is tightening up about as fast as his sciatica is on Monday mornings).  In a perfect world, we grab the best OT available and let him learn behind Rasheed Walker, Moton and the rest of our experienced linemen. If Icky comes back next year or late this season, that's great. If not, and Walker proves to be too expensive, we have our guy in place. If Icky does come back, we slide the guy to OT and move ahead, with five years of reasonable costs for OT. If I had my drothers, though, I want a TE or MLB right off the bat, the best one available.  Just not another WR.  We need to let our current trio cook a bit more. I'm not completely given up on XL. Third season tells the tale on WRs and he deserves at least that. Plus, on first rounders, grab someone who is involved in either every offensive or defensive play. Get the mileage guys here.
    • Basbear
      First Round Poll: Position Drafted

      By Basbear · Posted

      Here is my current guess about the first round, I feel Proctor is in the 8-25 group. Id personally draft him as high as 5th overall and be very happy. Again I don't understand the hate and lollololollolllo @ the 2nd round talk and you are right there lots of it.  You got Frank at everyone's #1, then my guess its bailey at #2, then a run of 4 OSU studs and now you are in fog of who or what is next. Love * should go no lower than 7th.....From that 8 pick to 25, its a mess. The whole draft doesn't have a good consensus like years before. Many players feel like 15 pick on this team board and 52nd pick on others. 
×
×
  • Create New...