Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, GoPanthers123 said:

Made in China virus.  They have to have a vaccine then, you need control over who gets infected if it’s a bio weapon.

Experts are very confident it's not a biological weapon. They're very confident it's a naturally evolved virus. They aren't certain that it didn't escape from a lab. There's a lab in Wuhan only a few miles away from that wet market that focuses on virus collection, sampling, and studying and there are some red flags about just how quickly the Chinese were to blame the wet market when there have been no shortage of concerns from virologists around the globe about those very wet markets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Experts are very confident it's not a biological weapon. They're very confident it's a naturally evolved virus. They aren't certain that it didn't escape from a lab. There's a lab in Wuhan only a few miles away from that wet market that focuses on virus collection, sampling, and studying and there are some red flags about just how quickly the Chinese were to blame the wet market when there have been no shortage of concerns from virologists around the globe about those very wet markets. 

It’s based on February 3rd posted research by Chinese researchers lol.  There is currently an ongoing investigation.

A6E20A9F-390F-4416-9571-20AD83246DDE.thumb.jpeg.3cd2795db004deb66b39222966e0a3cf.jpeg7616512A-E753-47F6-9D59-C5094BE2277B.thumb.jpeg.4a6891fb2b17aa703c03eef5ca99214a.jpeg
 

Here’s the today news not from Chinese nationals.

Coronavirus: Is there any evidence for lab release theory? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52318539

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It has been independently sequenced numerous times by numerous countries. How do you think we know that the NY outbreak primarily sources to European origin?

There are multiple stories.  Washington Post just reported researchers believe it was a leak.  I mean, common... Wuhan has institute specializing in Coronavirus SARS virus from bats to humans.  We have a SARS Coronavirus explosion from bats to humans in Wuhan.  In 2018, There were multiple safety violations by that institute and warning of SARS pandemic was sent to Washington DC.  And you tell me it’s natural?

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

There are multiple stories.  Washington Post just reported researchers believe it was a leak.  I mean, common... Wuhan has institute specializing in Coronavirus SARS virus from bats to humans.  We have a SARS Coronavirus explosion from bats to humans in Wuhan.  In 2018, There were multiple safety violations by that institute and warning of SARS pandemic was sent to Washington DC.  And you tell me it’s natural?

A leak is definitely possible. A leak does not preclude natural origins. That's what the experts are pretty damn certain about - the virus isn't bioengineered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • uncfan888
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By uncfan888 · Posted

      Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • HardcoreHokie
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By HardcoreHokie · Posted

      Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • MHS831
      Panthers WR Xavier Legette named potential trade candidate for 2026 offseason

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...