Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

Anyone think this could be the second wave we're currently in?  I've read many an article and even know some people directly who believe they may have had it back in December.  

 

People are fuging stupid and have no idea what they're talking about.

every one of my patients simultaneously think this is fake, and that they actually had it in december.

im in rural tennessee 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

I just find it hard to believe that as much as people freely travel that it wasn't here much earlier.  I suspect in a place like NY, that it was slowly percolating to the point that it got to now, and that took time.

What about this is so hard to believe? It's a novel virus. It likely started in China in October or November. It was likely fairly widespread in China by the time they reported to the WHO in late December. Still, that means thousands of cases. NY's outbreak was traced to Europe, not China. The vast majority of our outbreak traces to NY. With the high contagiousness of this virus, it doesn't "slowly percolate".

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

People are fuging stupid and have no idea what they're talking about.

every one of my patients simultaneously think this is fake, and that they actually had it in december.

im in rural tennessee 

Yeah, was just posing the possibility, mostly out of hope for a best-case scenario.  Still, in realizing the full scope of what's going on, my wife is a therapist at a SNF and if I went off of what has taken place there, it is clear they are dealing with something new that wasn't around in December.  But yeah, my curiosity stemmed from both stories of people I know - a college classmate's children both came down with a horrible upper respiratory infection that required hospitalization and oxygen supplementation back in December, and the doctors could not figure out what it was, as both tested negative for flu and eventually fully recovered - and an article I read in the New York Times recently about multiple similar cases in California from late last year...  combining those things with the news that they have confirmed some people died of the virus as early as February.  

Again, I guess it's just wishful thinking - hoping that we're past the peak...

33 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What about this is so hard to believe? It's a novel virus. It likely started in China in October or November. It was likely fairly widespread in China by the time they reported to the WHO in late December. Still, that means thousands of cases. NY's outbreak was traced to Europe, not China. The vast majority of our outbreak traces to NY. With the high contagiousness of this virus, it doesn't "slowly percolate".

Just wishful thinking, man...  maybe "hard to believe" wasn't the right phrasing...  I want to believe it was here earlier so that we're likely through the worst of it.  And I'm well aware of the contagiousness, as that is what separates it from everything else we're accustomed to at this point, but I was saying if looking at it from the possibility that this is the second wave, then couldn't it be possible that there were a few cases here and there late last year, but it took time to spread to such a degree that we now see in NY?  And as far as the travel thing, you're right...  I forgot when I wrote that, most of the US strains came from Italy...  

Regardless, I'm not purporting to be an expert of have any more knowledge about it then the next man...  again, I was just asking for the sake of hope, that we're on the other side of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Yeah, was just posing the possibility, mostly out of hope for a best-case scenario.  Still, in realizing the full scope of what's going on, my wife is a therapist at a SNF and if I went off of what has taken place there, it is clear they are dealing with something new that wasn't around in December.  But yeah, my curiosity stemmed from both stories of people I know - a college classmate's children both came down with a horrible upper respiratory infection that required hospitalization and oxygen supplementation back in December, and the doctors could not figure out what it was, as both tested negative for flu and eventually fully recovered - and an article I read in the New York Times recently about multiple similar cases in California from late last year...  combining those things with the news that they have confirmed some people died of the virus as early as February.  

Again, I guess it's just wishful thinking - hoping that we're past the peak...

Just wishful thinking, man...  maybe "hard to believe" wasn't the right phrasing...  I want to believe it was here earlier so that we're likely through the worst of it.  And I'm well aware of the contagiousness, as that is what separates it from everything else we're accustomed to at this point, but I was saying if looking at it from the possibility that this is the second wave, then couldn't it be possible that there were a few cases here and there late last year, but it took time to spread to such a degree that we now see in NY?  And as far as the travel thing, you're right...  I forgot when I wrote that, most of the US strains came from Italy...  

Regardless, I'm not purporting to be an expert of have any more knowledge about it then the next man...  again, I was just asking for the sake of hope, that we're on the other side of it.

The thing that concerns me most is that everyone is betting on that we're on the other side of it. Everyone expects this quick bounceback. No one is preparing for the economic impact and effect of a second wave.The second wave in the fall is practically inevitable. The only way to prevent an even bigger economic fallout is to develop some highly effective, widely available therapeutics in the meantime because a vaccine won't be ready in time to prevent it even in the best possible vaccine development case.

I can see it now. The second wave hits this fall and everyone is screaming and crying about "who could've predicted this??!!!" Well, just like the initial arrival of this pandemic on our shores, the answer is practically every virologist and epidemiologist on the planet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, stirs said:

Numbers are numbers, no matter who touts or ignores.  Now, if the numbers are wrong....

 

Overall curve is definitely trending down

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

This virus is much less contagious in warmer temperatures. It will continue to trend down over the summer. We NEED it to continue to trend down. If it doesn't, the second wave in the fall will be a helluva lot worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spanish Flu's 2nd and 3rd waves were the deadly ones.   Which is the scary part.   2nd wave really hit after that summer. 

I guess one good thing is scientist, at least at this point, don't believe COVID mutates like some others have.  I think it was really a mutated 2nd wave of the Spanish Flu that really did the damage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

2nd wave began with reopening poo up.  We're going to see tshtf in a month.

I honestly doubt it. I think there will probably be enough people who maintain social distancing standards, wear masks, etc. when combined with the naturally reduced contagiousness of the virus in warmer temps that it will postpone the second wave until the fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

the economy was tanking anyway before corona, they were just propping it up with rate cuts and overnight purchases. 

the US was faced with two problems: prevent the spread of the virus and salvage as much of the economy as possible. 

it has somehow failed to do either

How would you suggest to "salvage" the economy and still keep people at home?

This is a damned if you do, damned if you don't thing.  Walking the line between the two is the push/pull here.  Both sides saying too much of one and not enough of the other.  It is not a simple formula in uncharted waters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stirs said:

How would you suggest to "salvage" the economy and still keep people at home?

This is a damned if you do, damned if you don't thing.  Walking the line between the two is the push/pull here.  Both sides saying too much of one and not enough of the other.  It is not a simple formula in uncharted waters.

hopefully when this is all over....we have a better prepared approach for the next pandemic.   We didn't have to be in the position we currently are in. 

and there will be more.  We frankly are lucky COVID isn't more lethal.  I mean imagine if the next one has a SARS mortality rate and spreads like COVID.  The American superpower would be screwed based on how poorly we handled this. 

Maybe while we are over in S. Korea (our ally) teaching them about nukes and military drills.....we take some notes from them on how to address a pandemic properly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stirs said:

How would you suggest to "salvage" the economy and still keep people at home?

legitimate stimulus for people that can't work from home would do wonders. 

pair it with a jobs guarantee/work program afterwards so you can murder the gig economy once and for all

this was a once in a generation opportunity to remake the american economy moving forward and instead states are forcing people to either go back into a pandemic or starve and the president is telling people to inject bleach

Edited by electro's horse
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Things like this happen everyday. We live in a social media driven society where loyalty is a foreign concept.
    • If you draft a guy who is healthy and has no concerns about that whatsoever and he goes out and tears his ACL in his first few games in the regular season on a physical play that's a freak accident. But when you trade up to draft an RB who is already rehabbing from a recent ACL tear and he spends the next several months continuing his rehab only to tear the same ACL again after less than a handful of regular season carries in a non contact circumstance that is no freak accident. That is a textbook example of why you do not do what we did. Particularly for what is now a plug and play position. And when you have the highest paid OL in the league over the next two years. None of that makes any logical sense. Legitimately it is and was some Scott Fitterer type foolishness. Now as for XL. The guy has not been committed to his craft. I think anyone with eyes on the situation can and would recognize that. However the warning signs were there. One season of legit production raw prospect that we knew would take time to develop etc. But Morgan and Bryce Young's own father were very high on him. I think in some capacity the reality of our limitation at QB is entering into the equation. Even TMac got a lot of flak over the course of his rookie season for not being able to haul in all of Bryce's passes. At the end of the day our fourth year QB also needs to do his part to maximize the talent we have available. As far as this year. Again. WR round 1 boils down to where are we going to get the touches for the rookie? That would require eating into not only our 8th overall picks touches but also our #2 WR whom oh yeah by the way was UNDRAFTED. I am happy to discuss WR prospects here. I was thrilled we invested what we did last year in TMac because it needed to be done and it made sense from all angles. But nowhere is it written in stone that you cannot draft a good or great WR outside of the first round. Except in the Panthers building apparently. That is not a good reflection on our scouts and front office let me tell ya. Because there's no way on this earth we are going to get back to relevancy and legitimate contender status if we can't pick some gems in the later rounds. Simple and plain.
×
×
  • Create New...