Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Final Numbers: 3 years, 63 million dollars for Teddy Bridgewater


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

Per a source with knowledge of the contract, Bridgewater’s three-year deal with the Panthers pays out $63 million. Of that amount, $33 million is fully guaranteed.

That’s $21 million per year, the figured cited here on Monday when Bridgewater originally was linked to the Bears.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/17/three-years-63-million-for-teddy-bridgwater/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

They are definitely still looking at QB.  

They should. I like Bridgewater but he is more of a game managing type. He didn't exactly light the world on fire playing in an offense with arguably the best offensive mind in football running it. I can definitely see a scenario in which he is extremely underwhelming here given that we don't have nearly the talent on offense that New Orleans does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Per a source with knowledge of the contract, Bridgewater’s three-year deal with the Panthers pays out $63 million. Of that amount, $33 million is fully guaranteed.

That’s $21 million per year, the figured cited here on Monday when Bridgewater originally was linked to the Bears.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/17/three-years-63-million-for-teddy-bridgwater/

So if we cut after year 1 or 2 can we not have any dead cap? I know Hurney has a fetish for dead cap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Per a source with knowledge of the contract, Bridgewater’s three-year deal with the Panthers pays out $63 million. Of that amount, $33 million is fully guaranteed.

That’s $21 million per year, the figured cited here on Monday when Bridgewater originally was linked to the Bears.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/17/three-years-63-million-for-teddy-bridgwater/

Yeah the Bears tried to hijack but Hurndog nixed that.  Good work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Per a source with knowledge of the contract, Bridgewater’s three-year deal with the Panthers pays out $63 million. Of that amount, $33 million is fully guaranteed.

That’s $21 million per year, the figured cited here on Monday when Bridgewater originally was linked to the Bears.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/17/three-years-63-million-for-teddy-bridgwater/

  Thats an expensive bridge. Just not seeing the plan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rockahype said:

1. Let Bradberry get overpaid by someone else. 

2. Got rid of an overpaid, complacent speed bump in TT.

  The Turner-Okung trade has been brutalIzed in every grade it’s gotten. People were so confused they thought it was tanking as the Panthers picked up an older, overpaid (4.5M more than TT) LT. 
 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  The Turner-Okung trade has been brutalIzed in every grade it’s gotten. People were so confused they thought it was tanking as the Panthers picked up an older, overpaid (4.5M more than TT) LT. 
 

  

I don't think it is a terrible trade. LT is a much higher positional value versus OG and it has been our biggest OL weakness for a long time. Trai was the better overall player but he was also trending downward in his performances. 

I think it will end up as a wash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  The Turner-Okung trade has been brutalIzed in every grade it’s gotten. People were so confused they thought it was tanking as the Panthers picked up an older, overpaid (4.5M more than TT) LT. 
 

  

And I definitely understand surface level grades but they are just that at this point, surface level. We were on the hook for 2 more years with him and the current staff didn't feel like he fit our plan/team dynamic moving forward.

Trust the process... :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rockahype said:

And I definitely understand surface level grades but they are just that at this point, surface level. We were on the hook for 2 more years with him and the current staff didn't feel like he fit our plan/team dynamic moving forward.

Trust the process... :tongue:

I don't think even the most hardcore Panthers fan has any trust of the process so far. Between the owner, the GM and the head coach, I think they are just basically fumbling around in the dark trying to figure it all out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

I don't think it is a terrible trade. LT is a much higher positional value versus OG and it has been our biggest OL weakness for a long time. Trai was the better overall player but he was also trending downward in his performances. 

I think it will end up as a wash. 

  So a “better” player that is 5 years younger on a complete rebuild. For one year that isn’t going to go well anyhow. At close to 50% highest salary? What’s the thought process. They eat 9.6M dead cap + 13M for Okung. That 22.6M to keep the LT of the future away from LT. 
 

   Best bet is to wait for a LT to go down on another team and is desperate enough to trade for Okung. Get a 3rd and it’s back to what it should have been. A trade for a pick not a salary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...