Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bridgewater contract vs. 1st round qb


Actionman0z

Recommended Posts

PICK

TEAM

PLAYER

TOTAL CONTRACT

SIGNING BONUS

1

Cardinals

 Kyler Murray  $35.2 million  $23.6 million

2

49ers

 Nick Bosa  $33.6 million  $22.4 million

3

Jets

 Quinnen Williams  $32.6 million  $21.5 million

4

Raiders

 Clelin Ferrell  $31.4 million  $20.6 million

5

Buccaneers

 Devin White  $29.3 million  $19.1 million

6

Giants

 Daniel Jones  $25.7 million  $16.6 million

7

Jaguars

 Josh Allen  $22.8 million  $14.6 million

8

Lions

 T.J. Hockenson  $19.9 million  $12.7 million

9

Bills

 Ed Oliver  $19.7 million  $12.5 million

10

Steelers

 Devin Bush  $18.9 million  $11.9 million

 

Rookie contracts are pretty much based on draft position and not playing position

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Actionman0z said:

I meant, with the what TB5 is structured, does it make sense to draft one at 7 this year, or is QB now off the table?

It doesn’t matter. A QB at 7 gets paid like a backup QB for 4 years. Even top 5 picks next year don’t make enough to be bad cap hits. The only impact on selecting a QB is liking a guy enough. I just hope we don’t waste pick 7 on Herbert. The QBs next year are way better and pick 7 should be a bonafide stud just based on the number of studs and QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bridgewater's deal allows us to draft elsewhere and look at it again next year when we are drafting in the top 10 again. Very possibly the year after also. His deal is during the time of least competitiveness so it really doesn't matter and I don't see how throwing a rookie out there helps much, example David Carr. If we still don't have a decent LT next year then we would have a ways to go. The coaches need to step up and coach these players up and the ones that can't need to be gone regardless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We can easily afford a QB at #7 but the question is more whether we are looking in that direction. I think with the Bridgewater and PJ Walker signings, I would say we are done at QB for this offseason, unless something crazy happens like a Tua free fall. 

One thing few talked about when we signed TB was that it bought us time.  Before the signing, we had a starting QB under contract for one year, whose health/durability we had questions about.  IMO, that would have elevated the QB position in priority, either by draft or FA.  Even extending Cam would not have resolved that until well into the season, if he could stay on the field.  Now we have him (at least for the time being) and another starter who is signed on a manageable deal for three years.  That pushed the priority of the QB position back, even if/when we release/trade Cam.

Given our list of needs is almost as long as the list of positions on a football field, there is no rush and puts us in a position to be patient for a while and wait for "our guy" to be available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sgt Schultz said:

One thing few talked about when we signed TB was that it bought us time.  Before the signing, we had a starting QB under contract for one year, whose health/durability we had questions about.  IMO, that would have elevated the QB position in priority, either by draft or FA.  Even extending Cam would not have resolved that until well into the season, if he could stay on the field.  Now we have him (at least for the time being) and another starter who is signed on a manageable deal for three years.  That pushed the priority of the QB position back, even if/when we release/trade Cam.

Given our list of needs is almost as long as the list of positions on a football field, there is no rush and puts us in a position to be patient for a while and wait for "our guy" to be available.

I am curious to see how/if they plan to build a team here. Right now we are basically not committed to almost anyone on the roster outside of Shaq. Our "core" players is an extremely small group that could get a lot smaller after this coming season. So are we going to try and build a team AFTER we get our QB??? If so.....that's pretty ass backwards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am curious to see how/if they plan to build a team here. Right now we are basically not committed to almost anyone on the roster outside of Shaq. Our "core" players is an extremely small group that could get a lot smaller after this coming season. So are we going to try and build a team AFTER we get our QB??? If so.....that's pretty ass backwards. 

Gawd I hope not, unless somebody falls to us this year or next that walks on water.  Then again, people thought the Golden Calf walked on water.  Some though Manziel walked on water.

This draft is going to tell me a lot about our rebuilding plan.  And let's just say any potential personnel move in the front office after the draft will speak as loudly as the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...