Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron is wanting a trade down for the next Kuechly


MMA

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Smithers said:

They are nothing alike 

The next top once in a generation LB. Ron knows what it takes to win. He’s not as stupid as Panthers fans think he is. He’ll hand #59 to Simmons and watch him thrive for the next how many years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the furthest they can move back and still get him though? 3, 4?

They go to 5 or later and Giants might take him.  If they could trade with Giants that might work, I would guess Giants would take Young and then Lions would take Okuda or trade out with someone wanting Tua (Miami).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AU-panther said:

What's the furthest they can move back and still get him though? 3, 4?

They go to 5 or later and Giants might take him.  If they could trade with Giants that might work, I would guess Giants would take Young and then Lions would take Okuda or trade out with someone wanting Tua (Miami).

Who knows what the Lions and Giants will do. Giants just traded Slay. They did sign Jamie Collins and Reggie Ragland so in my opinion I would say that they go with Okudah. Dave will stick to his old self and surprise everyone else. Maybe a Derrick Brown, Epenesa or Yetur. Number 7 could be where Simmons falls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Untouchable said:

It's plausible. I mean next Luke is incorrect but rangy LBs are very important for Ron's defense.

Relying on one playmaker is Ron and Turners MO. They’re too traditional to adapt and way too stubborn to be a creative. They need 2-3 studs to drive into the ground to have any success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
    • On Panther's Wire too. No idea, just found it and trying to share. https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/06/15/nfl-free-agency-rumors-panthers-eagles-justin-simmons/84219881007/
×
×
  • Create New...