Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The importance of run defense


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

Last year our run defense was historically bad.  There is really no other way to put it.

Every old school coach likes to talk about the importance of stopping the run, and people love to talk about how it correlates with winning.  Somewhere RR is smiling.

Another poster linked a study from Stanford I think that showed a high correlation between winning and yards allowed per game, but is that a correlation or causation?

Think about it, teams that win a lot, tend to be ahead in games a lot (duh), therefore their opponent is more apt to abandon the run and throw more. 

So does stopping the run increase your chances of winning or does winning (having the lead) help you stop the run?  I'm guessing it is some of both. 

On the other hand teams that lose a lot, tend to be behind in a lot of games (duh), and therefore their opponent, who has the lead, might be more inclined to run it more which causes the losing team to allow more yards per game.

So instead of looking at yards per game. which can be influenced heavily by whether you are winning or losing, lets look at yards per attempt.

Last year, 9/12 playoff teams were in the bottom half of YPA allowed.

Last year, 5/12 playoff teams were in the bottom 10 of YPA allowed.

Only one playoff team in the top 10 of YPA allowed. Titans

The two teams that played in the Super Bowl were 23 and 29 respectively.  

I'm not saying we don't need to improve our defensive line.  I'm not saying we don't need to improve our rush defense, but we have to keep it in perspective.  

Its a passing league.  Also our division has some really good QBs and WRs in it.

Think about it.  If you give up 3.8 yards on first down, which is considered great, or 4.4 yards, which is considered bad, its still basically 2nd and 6 and your opponent is throwing.  More times then not to stop a drive you have to stop a team on third down when they are passing.  (on a side note, this is why RBs don't influence the game near as much as people think they do).  Its a passing league.

On top of all of this we have some pretty good QBs in our division and some really good WRs so you need to build your team to win your division first.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Last year our run defense was historically bad.  There is really no other way to put it.

Every old school coach likes to talk about the importance of stopping the run, and people love to talk about how it correlates with winning.  Somewhere RR is smiling.

Another poster linked a study from Stanford I think that showed a high correlation between winning and yards allowed per game, but is that a correlation or causation?

Think about it, teams that win a lot, tend to be ahead in games a lot (duh), therefore their opponent is more apt to abandon the run and throw more. 

So does stopping the run increase your chances of winning or does winning (having the lead) help you stop the run?  I'm guessing it is some of both. 

On the other hand teams that lose a lot, tend to be behind in a lot of games (duh), and therefore their opponent, who has the lead, might be more inclined to run it more which causes the losing team to allow more yards per game.

So instead of looking at yards per game. which can be influenced heavily by whether you are winning or losing, lets look at yards per attempt.

Last year, 9/12 playoff teams were in the bottom half of YPA allowed.

Last year, 5/12 playoff teams were in the bottom 10 of YPA allowed.

Only one playoff team in the top 10 of YPA allowed. Titans

The two teams that played in the Super Bowl were 23 and 29 respectively.  

I'm not saying we don't need to improve our defensive line.  I'm not saying we don't need to improve our rush defense, but we have to keep it in perspective.  

Its a passing league.  Also our division has some really good QBs and WRs in it.

Think about it.  If you give up 3.8 yards on first down, which is considered great, or 4.4 yards, which is considered bad, its still basically 2nd and 6 and your opponent is throwing.  More times then not to stop a drive you have to stop a team on third down when they are passing.  (on a side note, this is why RBs don't influence the game near as much as people think they do).  Its a passing league.

On top of all of this we have some pretty good QBs in our division and some really good WRs so you need to build your team to win your division first.

 

 

 

DL does more than stop the run, everything starts there. Not only do they rush the passer. CBs dont have to cover as long if the DL can collapse the pocket.  LBs can roam freely and cover effectively and get in the backfield.  A good space eating DT is so important to the overall defense and is why we should go Brown at 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand how ppl can't find the correlation when a team is top 5 in sacks and pressure.. But couldn't stop any offense in the league.. By the end of the season teams that couldn't run against anybody decided to stick to the running the ball  against us and get easy wins....  I don't even think our Secondary played that bad.. They just couldn't cover up for the ball getting pounded down our throat... 

Plain and simple our defense failed in the front 7.. We don't have a offense yet that is going to out score teams.. And the 1st thing any defense in history wants to be able to do is stop the run.. When a team can run down your throat they can control the game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bytes said:

I dont necessary disagree but there is one factor missing from this. Teams that are AHEAD tend to see more passing. 

exactly, and they see less running so their rush defense improves by default if you are looking at yards per game.

They aren't necessarily winning because they are stopping the other teams rushing attack.  They are stopping the other teams rushing attack by being ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes it was and honestly, it's gonna be even worse this year.

I doubt it.

Its hard to be historically bad 2 years in a row :)

We had injuries last year and we had just switched to the 3-4

At the very worst we start Short and Kerr as our DTs, that really isn't too bad, and I'm sure we will add another to either start or rotate heavily.

I'm actually worried about strongside DE just because the draft is a bit weak at that position.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

exactly, and they see less running so their rush defense improves by default if you are looking at yards per game.

They aren't necessarily winning because they are stopping the other teams rushing attack.  They are stopping the other teams rushing attack by being ahead.

  So what are the numbers for these teams in the 2nd half, when leading? Or whatever specific situation needed to justify. Does the YPA go up because the DEF doesn’t care if they run draws? If we are downgrading defenses because they are “ahead too much”,  

   The Panthers are replacing a combined trio of Poe, McCoy and Butler with a guy who spent last September watching the NFL on his TV at home. And it will make the DEF better? Good luck with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly have ppl let this new passing league narrative.. Fooled them into thinking that you don't need to do the basic anymore?? 

Being able to run and stopping the run are still the fastest ways to success... You build from those 2 principles and everything else falls into place...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AU-panther said:

Last year our run defense was historically bad.  There is really no other way to put it.

Every old school coach likes to talk about the importance of stopping the run, and people love to talk about how it correlates with winning.  Somewhere RR is smiling.

Another poster linked a study from Stanford I think that showed a high correlation between winning and yards allowed per game, but is that a correlation or causation?

Think about it, teams that win a lot, tend to be ahead in games a lot (duh), therefore their opponent is more apt to abandon the run and throw more. 

So does stopping the run increase your chances of winning or does winning (having the lead) help you stop the run?  I'm guessing it is some of both. 

On the other hand teams that lose a lot, tend to be behind in a lot of games (duh), and therefore their opponent, who has the lead, might be more inclined to run it more which causes the losing team to allow more yards per game.

So instead of looking at yards per game. which can be influenced heavily by whether you are winning or losing, lets look at yards per attempt.

Last year, 9/12 playoff teams were in the bottom half of YPA allowed.

Last year, 5/12 playoff teams were in the bottom 10 of YPA allowed.

Only one playoff team in the top 10 of YPA allowed. Titans

The two teams that played in the Super Bowl were 23 and 29 respectively.  

I'm not saying we don't need to improve our defensive line.  I'm not saying we don't need to improve our rush defense, but we have to keep it in perspective.  

Its a passing league.  Also our division has some really good QBs and WRs in it.

Think about it.  If you give up 3.8 yards on first down, which is considered great, or 4.4 yards, which is considered bad, its still basically 2nd and 6 and your opponent is throwing.  More times then not to stop a drive you have to stop a team on third down when they are passing.  (on a side note, this is why RBs don't influence the game near as much as people think they do).  Its a passing league.

On top of all of this we have some pretty good QBs in our division and some really good WRs so you need to build your team to win your division first.

 

 

 

How many of those stats take into account 4th quarter and game adjustments?

the Chiefs don’t win that Super Bowl or any playoff game for that matter without that defense.

they got behind badly in every game and looked like a fraud.

the defense would make heavy adjustments and “shut that poo down“—Negan Ha.

all of those teams imposed their run on the Chiefs and all of them got  pancaked In the 3rd and 4th quarter

 

your stats don’t cover that part. Most stats are worthless and don’t tell the whole story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

Honestly have ppl let this new passing league narrative.. Fooled them into thinking that you don't need to do the basic anymore?? 

Being able to run and stopping the run are still the fastest ways to success... You build from those 2 principles and everything else falls into place...

 

  

 

4 different playoff victories from last year had 131, 72, 88, and 77 yards passing for the WINNING team. Those are Service Academy type numbers. When’s the last time that happened. 
 

    If the 49ers don’t blow a coverage on 3rd and 15, this passing league would have been won by a team that only threw when they wanted. 
 

   With all the emphasis on speed at every position and more dime coverage, you can wear a team out rather quickly if their not ready for that style. We don’t even need to get into the whole “play-action” discussion, and the effects of not being able to run the ball/stop the run on the passing game/defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toomers said:

 

  

 

4 different playoff victories from last year had 131, 72, 88, and 77 yards passing for the WINNING team. Those are Service Academy type numbers. When’s the last time that happened. 
 

    If the 49ers don’t blow a coverage on 3rd and 15, this passing league would have been won by a team that only threw when they wanted. 
 

   With all the emphasis on speed at every position and more dime coverage, you can wear a team out rather quickly if their not ready for that style. We don’t even need to get into the whole “play-action” discussion, and the effects of not being able to run the ball/stop the run on the passing game/defense. 

Agreed.. It feels like a whole bunch of Madden players are coming up with studies and stats now... And can't see the facts in front of their faces... It isn't that hard.. You win consistently from the trenches...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Draft picks are better for cap management and production always outperforms athleticism over time.  
    • awesome interview. Love the guy. 
    • all the trades and using PFFs draft rankings and Gemini's analysis: This is a high-value mock draft that effectively uses trade-down strategies to rebuild the Carolina Panthers' defensive interior and add depth to a roster with multiple holes. By turning mid-round capital into a volume of picks, you've secured several "sliding" stars and developmental high-ceiling players. Based on 2026 PFF big board trends and player value, here is the analysis: Draft Grade: A- The Top Picks: Interior Dominance  * 19. Peter Woods (DT, Clemson): Getting Woods at 19 is a steal. Heading into the 2025 season, he was viewed as a potential top-5 talent. While his production dipped slightly, his 4.75 40-yard dash at 315 lbs is elite. He provides the Panthers with a versatile disruptor who can play 3-tech or slide outside.  * 63. Dontay Corleone (DT, Cincinnati): "The Godfather" is one of the best pure nose tackles in the class. Pairing him with Woods creates an immediate identity for the Panthers' front seven. PFF loves his "unmovable" anchor. Securing him at the end of Round 2 after trading down from 51/53 is excellent value. The Mid-Round Steals  * 83. Deontae Lawson (LB, Alabama): Lawson is a high-IQ "green dot" linebacker. Many scouts projected him as a late 1st or early 2nd rounder before an ACL injury in late 2024. Getting a 2-time Alabama captain at 83 to lead the defense is a massive win for culture and stability.  * 130. Drew Allar (QB, Penn State): This is the "high-upside lottery ticket" pick. Allar has prototypical size (6'5", 240 lbs) and a massive arm. His stock fell due to a 2025 ankle injury and inconsistency, but at 130, he’s a low-risk, high-reward backup/successor to Bryce Young if the former No. 1 pick continues to struggle. Trade Analysis & Late Round Value Your strategy of "tier-dropping" (trading 51 for 53/121 and 53 for 63/95) allowed you to stay in the same talent bracket while picking up Kevin Coleman Jr. (WR) and Genesis Smith (S).  * 168. Parker Brailsford (OC, Alabama): Great value for a technical center who can compete for a depth spot.  * 169. Tacario Davis (CB, Washington): At 6'4", he is a rare physical specimen at corner. PFF and other boards often have him as a Day 2 talent; getting him in the 5th round (via the 161 trade) is arguably your best value pick of the draft. Summary of Picks | Pick | Player | Position | School | Analysis | | 19 | Peter Woods | DT | Clemson | Elite traits; Top-10 ceiling. | | 63 | Dontay Corleone | DT | Cincinnati | Best run stuffer in the class. | | 83 | Deontae Lawson | LB | Alabama | Vocal leader; sliding due to injury. | | 121 | Kevin Coleman Jr. | WR | Missouri | Speed threat to complement the room. | | 130 | Drew Allar | QB | Penn State | High-ceiling developmental passer. | | 169 | Tacario Davis | CB | Washington | Massive reach/length for a late flyer. | Final Verdict You addressed the trenches aggressively and took advantage of "injury discounts" on Lawson and Allar. The only minor critique is that the roster still feels thin at Edge (until the 211 pick), but the sheer volume of talent added to the interior DL and Secondary compensates for it.
×
×
  • Create New...