Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible Starting Defense After Draft


jfra78

Recommended Posts

We are two vet FA CBS away from being decent. I think we all know we won’t be in the playoffs next season but I am extremely impressed with this draft and our ability to replenish a defensive unit that looked like it could be the worst of all time before Thursday. Next year watch out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't count too much on anybody beyond possibly the first two picks being immediate starters. There'll be some transition time needed.

If we do have more rookie starters than that, then I wouldn't set my expectations too high for them...or our defense as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats not listed here is the depth, which is a big need too. 6th round draftee is the top backup at DT. Shocking is there is some decent safety depth.

CB is a blackhole, no comment. Herniay needs to sign or trade whatever to get at least 2 NFL CB on this team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't count too much on anybody beyond possibly the first two picks being immediate starters. There'll be some transition time needed.

If we do have more rookie starters than that, then I wouldn't set my expectations too high for them...or our defense as a whole.

You know Rhule is going to throw them all on the field. It’s pretty clear he’s trying to build a unit as if it was a college unit that’s going to be together for 4 years. Aka Seattle during their legion of boom time or w/e it was called. 
 

Let’s be real. Without all these rookies starting we still can’t even field a defense at this point. Much less a good one. The reality is our defense is gonna get torched worse than last year either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • More praise of Renfrow from Tim Weaver (formerly of USA Today's Panthers Wire, now SI.com), and also what I told some of you, my Huddle friends, from the start: keep it all in perspective, and don't conveniently---and perhaps unfairly, discount and label Renfrow as a JAG when it was a very debilitating illness affecting his play.    "It's understandable to be skeptical about Renfrow's abilities at this late point in his career. After all, he missed all of last season due to a bout of ulcerative colitis that also took a serious toll on his production in 2022 and 2023."   When Renfrow is healthy, he's an above average guy. Being 29 may hurt or help his chances depending upon perspective, but 29 for receivers generally means that there's still (sometimes plenty) gas in the tank. Renfrow also obviously has plenty of motivation and has come with his game face.   "Then agan, seeing is believing and by all accounts Renfrow has been very impressive since joining the Panthers a few months ago... Where Renfrow will fit in Carolina's new-look receiver corps remains to be seen, but at this rate it's going to be hard to exclude him from the initial 53-man roster." https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/hunter-renfrow-sick-route-panthers-training-camp Read the room, ladies and gentlemen. And don't get it twisted; Renfrow isn't the most talented receiver on the team, but we have seen his ceiling, when healthy, in a Raiders offense that wasn't necessary replete with talent. Consider what he can do, especially in the slot, in a Panthers offense primed with young talent (no pun intended). From sick to "sick routes," eh?
    • That is literally what I am talking about. Those were 53 man cuts. Not at the beginning of camp.  I would say the odds of Barno being back are extremely thin.
×
×
  • Create New...