Matt Rhule considering kneeling during anthem.

[kungfoodude]

47 minutes ago, tgrfan01 said:

24 Native American 266 Black 183 Hispanic/Latino 574 White 21 Asian/Pacific Islander 25 Other/Unknown this is from 2016

Someone doesn't understand math. 

[mav1234]

3 hours ago, tgrfan01 said:

yep..easy to kneel with the herd

LOL kneel with the herd, you mean like how easy it was for Kap?

society has changed, sorry it left you behind.

[1of10Charnatives]

On 6/25/2020 at 3:30 PM, t96 said:

Yeah in today’s climate unfortunately you’re not allowed to have your own views and if you do you are immediately labeled and ostracized. He should know this and be smarter than that.

You are allowed to have your own views.

Others are allowed to evaluate those views for themselves.

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences of that speech.

A LOT of people who like to talk loudly about freedom of speech seem oblivious to this reality and seem to desire a world in which they can not only say whatever they like, but are free from any negative repercussions if what they say is unpopular.

If you get labeled as being racist because you say racist things and ostracized because society has decided racism is no longer tolerable, then that's on you.

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

Wow we've seen the whole playbook in the past two pages

"what about chicago, facts don't care about your feelings, i'm very smart and special because i disagree with the anthem protests, reee wake up sheeple, oh no people are disagreeing with me and criticizing my opinions, clearly this is a flagrant violation of muh free speech"

 

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

59 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

 

If you get labeled as being racist because you say racist things and ostracized because society has decided racism is no longer tolerable, then that's on you.

To be fair some of the people who use the kind of rhetoric you described are mad about the bolded part.

[Devil Doc]

9 hours ago, rodeo said:

that's more people than all gang murders combined

How many of these were justified though? I do not mind Cops killing people. The ones that are shooting at people, causing terror, placing bombs etc... get killed my shootouts, or other scenarios. The Murders that Cops do that need more focused on are unjust ones, overstepping boundaries, killing for bullshit charges or assumptions. 

[4Corners]

26 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

How many of these were justified though? I do not mind Cops killing people. The ones that are shooting at people, causing terror, placing bombs etc... get killed my shootouts, or other scenarios. The Murders that Cops do that need more focused on are unjust ones, overstepping boundaries, killing for bullshit charges or assumptions. 

Killing someone and physical force from police officers should be a last resort. Funny that every time a white person shoots up a movie theatre, church, or school they are often arrested without incident. 

[Devil Doc]

1 minute ago, 4Corners said:

Killing someone and physical force from police officers should be a last resort. Funny that every time a white person shoots up a movie theatre, church, or school they are often arrested without incident. 

Did you just assume that I said shooting someone was not a last resort? Interesting. Clearly the examples I gave make it seem the opposite. When someone post how many people cops shot this year alone.. it does not include the justification or reasons. I would be precarious  on using the word every time, as in the situation, person, LE dictate the scenarios. Is there an abundance of misguided or partisan use of force, certainly. It is not an absolute however. 

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

If I was a redhat I don't know that I'd be shooting my mouth off about how much I love the troops right now

[mc52beast]

On 6/25/2020 at 5:32 PM, ladypanther said:

Well...it appears everyone does not get it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/06/24/jack-del-rio-creates-stir-with-twitter-activity-redskins-have-no-comment/

 

 

 

Jack...stay off twitter.   lol

No worries, Twitter will probably end up banning him. They don’t like opposing views.

[mav1234]

19 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

No worries, Twitter will probably end up banning him. They don’t like opposing views.

OH GOD THIS SLOPE IS SO SLIPPERY, AHHHH!!!

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

2 hours ago, mc52beast said:

No worries, Twitter will probably end up banning him. They don’t like opposing views.

They're a private company and can ban whoever they want.  Start your own Twitter if you don't like it commie.

[Drk89Wng]

For the saltines that always bring up black on black violence to counter police violence let me ask y’all a question. If a person who is bound by the policies of a job that entails protecting and serving kills someone unjustly should you not be more outraged than at someone who willingly under no obligation but purely chose to kill someone. Neither is right but which is more controllable? Seriously y’all always throw out numbers but over look certain aspects because its not part of your belief system. 

[USC/panthers_11]

31 minutes ago, Drk89Wng said:

For the saltines that always bring up black on black violence to counter police violence let me ask y’all a question. If a person who is bound by the policies of a job that entails protecting and serving kills someone unjustly should you not be more outraged than at someone who willingly under no obligation but purely chose to kill someone. Neither is right but which is more controllable? Seriously y’all always throw out numbers but over look certain aspects because its not part of your belief system. 

Saltines? That's a racist comment and you should be banned.