Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Play Anticipation


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Quick note on something that happened yesterday which raised an eyebrow...

At one point when we were in the red zone, members of the Raiders secondary were calling out our routes ahead of the play...and they were getting it right. Fellow O-Line fan MHS831 also mentioned that it seemed like the Raiders defensive line knew what was coming on the final play.

Now granted, that final play could just be an example of a team guessing right. Calling out our routes, though? That's a concern. Pair the two together and it makes you wonder.

There's no film of our offense to go on (unless you count film of LSU or the Saints) so it's kind of hard to attribute this to really good scouting.

So how do you suppose something like this occurs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

I wonder what that was in game, even the announcer mentioned it. Maybe because without a crowd the D could hear more of what the O was saying and picked it all up as the game went on? If not, yikes. The possibilities don't seem great.

That's a thought, but they'd still have to have some understanding of the terminology.

If we're being predictable, that's something that'll need to be corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Quick note on something that happened yesterday which raised an eyebrow...

At one point when we were in the red zone, members of the Raiders secondary we're calling out our routes ahead of the play, and they were getting it right. Fellow O-Line fan MHS831 also mentioned that it seemed like the Raiders defensive line knew what was coming on the final play.

Now granted, that final play could just be an example of a team guessing right. Calling out our routes, though? That's a concern. Pair the two together and it makes you wonder.

There's no film of our offense to go on (unless you count film of LSU or the Saints) so it's kind of hard to attribute this to really good scouting.

So how do you suppose something like this occurs?

I heard one of the announcers mention this during the game when Teddy almost threw an INT to Anderson down the seam. The announcer said the Raiders were yelling “GO” before the ball was snapped thinking we were sending receivers on go/fly routes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's a thought, but they'd still have to have some understanding of the terminology.

If we're being predictable, that's something that'll need to be corrected.

I agree. I am also interested in if other teams had this issue.

How can you be predictable enough with no film or history of our entire staff in the NFL at all to be that predictable? So weird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Maybe Brady didn't change up his terminology from LSU and the Raiders studied the Tigers offense from last season

Legit possibility...

I can't remember who it was but some team last year used a similar tactic, studying somebody's college offense to get an idea what they'd do.

(might have been Kingsbury)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Brady is trying to run the Saints offense and not his own spin on it, there is an incredible amount of film for the defense to gameplan around.  I remember when the Lions had Joe Lombardi calling the plays and he was trying to run the Saints offense without tweaking it.  It was a horrible mistake and teams knew what was coming.  First, because obviously the Saints offense had an incredible amount of film out there to study.  But secondly, because the Saints change personnel so dang much.  Constantly changing personnel is great if its done right, but when its not done right it just shows your cards and narrows down the play selection the defense should be prepared for.  After the Lions played the Saints with Lombardi as the playcaller, Drew Brees said after the game that he knew what the Lions were running like 90% of the time.

In the end the fact that we hung 30 on them says that while they were able to guess some plays right, they certainly didn't have our number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL is an incestuous business.  It's highly likely somebody coached someone who played for someone who knew someone who coached for someone else, etc, etc...  Plus, a good bit of the terminology and "codespeak" is used multiple teams from similar coaching trees.  Plus, I think some of the looks may have made it obvious.  These guys live, breath, and die football and x's and o's, so I think even without film they are able to recognize certain packages and how those packages may be executed during a play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW Gruden gets sh(t on a lot here and around the media/fanbases, but he really is a very good coach who prepares as much as anyone. Granted, even if the Raiders staff did some crazy amount of scouting of Brady at LSU or whatever, this shouldn't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...