Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucs sign Ross Cockrell

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Serviceable zone CBs are a dime a dozen. Like non-pass rushing LBs who are liabilities in coverage. We just didn't get the memo on that latter one.

It depends how you define "serviceable." I don't think any team with SB aspirations would want a player of Cockrell's caliber getting any meaningful snaps. It's one thing to have him as a depth guy in case of injury to fill in but if you have to rely on him to play even 25% of the snaps, your secondary is in trouble to some degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, t96 said:

It depends how you define "serviceable." I don't think any team with SB aspirations would want a player of Cockrell's caliber getting any meaningful snaps. It's one thing to have him as a depth guy in case of injury to fill in but if you have to rely on him to play even 25% of the snaps, your secondary is in trouble to some degree.

He also looked better here because the people around him looked worse. The league value for him was obviously pretty low. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, t96 said:

It depends how you define "serviceable." I don't think any team with SB aspirations would want a player of Cockrell's caliber getting any meaningful snaps. It's one thing to have him as a depth guy in case of injury to fill in but if you have to rely on him to play even 25% of the snaps, your secondary is in trouble to some degree.

That's basically what I mean by serviceable. You don't want to have to play him but he won't be a massive liability if you do. His main issue is low ceiling. There's no potential factor there to entice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • electro's horse
      NextGen Passing Chart - Week 3

      By electro's horse · Posted

      yeah but whats a drop, because at this point bryce defenders point to anything that hits a part of the receivers body as a drop  like when renfrow had to stop and twist and reach behind himself yesterday are we calling that a drop? because that's a terrible throw. Just because someone can get a paw on it doesn't mean it should have been caught or wasn't a bad throw  and his defenders get so caught up in this that they ignore the simple fact that this kind of production is just what the panthers have gotten from the QB position since he's been here, and that stretches across multiple coaching staffs and wide receiver rooms.  What's the common factor in three years of 12/25, 125 yards, maybe a TD, maybe a lost fumble, maybe an interception, around 20 points scored when things are going well
    • LinvilleGorge
      Brilliant!

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We'll see. I mean, I don't see us winning many games where we barely throw for under 130 yards and 0 TDs. So I'm not worried about that. If we end up with a better than expected record then Bryce will have to put up significantly better numbers. 
    • CRA
      NextGen Passing Chart - Week 3

      By CRA · Posted

      Go watch his call placement to Renfrow on the year.   Or basically every WR that isn’t an eraser like TMac who can just pull of some insanity.   he should have a high completion % given where a mass % of his throw locations are 
×
×
  • Create New...