Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LEAKED: Phil Snow's Weekly Defensive Gameplan


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mage said:

I don't think Snow is to blame, but I gotta admit, this is actually the perfect gif to describe our defense.

Kudos.  We try our best, but it's always too much for us to overcome.

Nah I've seen enough of snow. the dude is college through and through. He's Rhules main guy so Rhule should make him senior advisor or some special title and allow snow to still be a part of this team but he needs to get a quality NFL DC in that can call the plays and feel the game better next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mage said:

I don't think Snow is to blame, but I gotta admit, this is actually the perfect gif to describe our defense.

Kudos.  We try our best, but it's always too much for us to overcome.

No doubt he has a lot of deficiencies to mask, but man, some of these calls were inexcusable.  The personnel is the biggest issue by far, but playing 20 yards off the LOS on a 3rd and 19 while rushing 3 is equally bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

No doubt he has a lot of deficiencies to mask, but man, some of these calls were inexcusable.  The personnel is the biggest issue by far, but playing 20 yards off the LOS on a 3rd and 19 while rushing 3 is equally bad.

Perfect calls with awful players are going to look bad. We have a talent deficit at really key positions on defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not Snows fault that his only talent to work with are rookies, an overpaid decent LB, and Brian Burns. Seriously, no one would be able to field a decent D with this roster. I'm just encouraged that it looks like we have some building blocks to work with going forward. Anytime the majorities of your talent is rookies and a 2nd year player it's not gonna be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It's not Snows fault that his only talent to work with are rookies, an overpaid decent LB, and Brian Burns. Seriously, no one would be able to field a decent D with this roster. I'm just encouraged that it looks like we have some building blocks to work with going forward. Anytime the majorities of your talent is rookies and a 2nd year player it's not gonna be good.

I agree.  He has almost nothing to work with.  But, again, some of the calls were just bad.  I know most of these guys are not going to be back next year...  in fact, most of them probably won't even be in the NFL.  I give Snow the benefit of the doubt going into next season, regardless.  This season isn't on him, but man it's hard to watch...  forcing 1 punt in 4 weeks, or whatever it is, is just horrible.

And I really, really, really hope they bench Boston and Whitehead the rest of the year.  It's fine if they're good in the locker room, but they suck on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

I agree.  He has almost nothing to work with.  But, again, some of the calls were just bad.  I know most of these guys are not going to be back next year...  in fact, most of them probably won't even be in the NFL.  I give Snow the benefit of the doubt going into next season, regardless.  This season isn't on him, but man it's hard to watch...  forcing 1 punt in 4 weeks, or whatever it is, is just horrible.

And I really, really, really hope they bench Boston and Whitehead the rest of the year.  It's fine if they're good in the locker room, but they suck on the field.

They absolutely need to be benched. At this point I don't even care if the guys behind them are even worse. Hell, give them a chance and see if they're gamers. It's gonna be hard to be worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Posters scream for us to get more aggressive then scream when we give up a 98 yard TD because we tried to be aggressive. When your last line of defense is completely unreliable it pretty much takes away your ability to be aggressive.

To be fair LG, that was on Boston, but it didn't appear we were being overly aggressive.  I'd have to go back and watch, but it looked like they came out in a heavy/goalline set and qe matched personnel...  as a result, we were overloaded on the line and had the box stacked bc no one was wide.  We simply just didn't have good gap discipline and then Boston was Boston.

EDIT: I stand corrected.  Just started watching Rhule's presser and he said we blitzed from the right, but one of the guys to didnt fill their gap and that's what busted the run open.  So we were playing it aggressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...