Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Season About Over


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

Gotta say I was highly impressed with UNC's record setting win over Miami yesterday. 

We all have our hopes set on a QB for our first pick but have no idea how we'll finish.  So I'll leave that argument for after the season. 

What I'm interested in is what players do you have on your wish list.  Players that may be available in rounds 2 through 7.  I've watch a lot of games but never really took notice of what year they were in.  I'm really interested in the potential O-lineman, TE and defensive players that will fit Rhule's criteria.

I would love to see us get another hybrid player like Chinn.  Is there one in this draft?

Who is going to be that gem that we steal in the latter rounds?

Also potential Free Agents that could fill spots prior to the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I love me some UNC but you’re starting to sound like a broken record. Besides, doesn’t he have at least one more year of school?

Correct. He also isn’t the goat. UNC has been dominant on the ground this year. There’s a chance with one more good game from the backers they have two running backs go over 1k yards this year. I think it’s more of Carolina boy playing slim Carolina and having success so he wants to cheer for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

Suratt just might be the MLB we need to fill some of the gaping hole that Kuech left in retirement. 

Paddy Fisher is better. Surratt, while still growing into the position, disappeared for entire games this year. He's gonna be a good player, but he's too inconsistent to choose over Fisher. He makes some splash plays, but he needs to get a LOT stronger to shed blocks in the NFL. He may wind up being an OLB in the NFL.

Speaking of Tarheels, we just paid a crap ton of money to a RB and now a couple of teams are gonna get Carter and Williams for dirt cheap...RBs who excel at absolutely every aspect of being RBs in the NFL. Williams may be the next Marshawn Lynch, only faster and a better receiver.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

Paddy Fisher is better. Surratt, while still growing into the position, disappeared for entire games this year. He's gonna be a good player, but he's too inconsistent to choose over Fisher. He makes some splash plays, but he needs to get a LOT stronger to shed blocks in the NFL. He may wind up being an OLB in the NFL.

Speaking of Tarheels, we just paid a crap ton of money to a RB and now a couple of teams are gonna get Carter and Williams for dirt cheap...RBs who excel at absolutely every aspect of being RBs in the NFL. Williams may be the next Marshawn Lynch, only faster and a better receiver.

 

Haven’t seen much film on Fisher.

 

Williams did go beast mode yesterday. Good gawd...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Varking said:

Correct. He also isn’t the goat. UNC has been dominant on the ground this year. There’s a chance with one more good game from the backers they have two running backs go over 1k yards this year. I think it’s more of Carolina boy playing slim Carolina and having success so he wants to cheer for him. 

Both RBs are well over 1,000 yards rushing. Just an FYI. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Shocker said:

These dudes aren’t anywhere near CMC though.  

Anywhere near? I'd say CMC is better, but nowhere near $15 million better. Especially with the holes we have elsewhere. I like CMC, but I also think paying $16 million a year for a RB is a bad investment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...