Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 QBs in the top 4?


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, ncfan said:

And your Point?

Washington had a probowl calibre edge rusher 

Traded up into the 1st rounder in the year before for edge Rusher Montez Sweat.  But would budge off some massive trade offer from teams wanting to move up for a QB.  When there is a elite player especially at a prime position.  

Heck Sewell has been hyped as the Trevor Lawerence version of OTs.  Doeant matter who the Dolphins drafted.  Theyll take Sewell.  Itd have to be very very rich to convince them otherwise

 

And talking about them adding weapons.  They already have a 2nd 1st rd pick that they can grab a WR with

Obviously my point is that they need weapons more than anything. I perfectly well know what Sewell offers, and I also know what Devante Smith offers. 

You can say weapons can be had later, but they need a minimum of 2 starting caliber WR and a starting RB. You hear alot about some struggles for Tua because the kid has nobody to throw to. Their receivers create the least separation in the NFL. They started 2 straight games with Mack Hollins as their top receiver. 

They may pick Sewell assuming the Jets don't, but it is definitely not a given for them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Growl said:

except they do, it's happened multiple times in just the last few draft's and absolutely would've happened last draft with MIA if need be, and in the case of the jets, who made a comparable deal, was done without a single additional first.

And how has it worked out for those teams? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

And how has it worked out for those teams? 

lol keep moving those goalposts but what are you even arguing here? 

that sam darnold inhabits Justin fields' or Zach Wilson's body when he isn't busy? these are different players, they aren't the same person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Weren't the Jets the last team to do it when they traded up for Darnold?  Worked out well for them.  They are once again in the top 5 drafting order, while the team that suckered them is in the playoffs.  

Now is that on Darnold or Gase? I'm not pretending Darnold has been great by any standards, but damn, Gase is absolutely fugging horrible. He drags down everyone around him to a pathetic level. He's the Jamarcus Russell of coaches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol keep moving those goalposts but what are you even arguing here? 

that sam darnold inhabits Justin fields' or Zach Wilson's body when he isn't busy? these are different players, they aren't the same person.

Trading up into the top 5 = bad. That's about as simple as I can make it for you. Teams rarely do it because they understand it's bad (look at all the recent examples of the teams who traded up into the top 5 for a Qb). It has yet to work out in their favor. It's the same point I've been arguing the entire thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Trading up into the top 5 = bad. That's about as simple as I can make it for you. Teams rarely do it because they understand it's bad (look at all the recent examples of the teams who traded up into the top 5 for a Qb). It has yet to work out in their favor. It's the same point I've been arguing the entire thread

every single thing you've said=bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Good one! So which team is super bowl bound with their top 5 Qb they acquired in a trade? 

why don't you add some more qualifiers

Perhaps they should only have blonde hair, or be named Jerry

Maybe they should have a caramel daschund named sunny at home

this is such a narrow minded view lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

why don't you add some more qualifiers

Perhaps they should only have blonde hair, or be named Jerry

Maybe they should have a caramel daschund named sunny at home

this is such a narrow minded view lol

 

What's narrow minded is you people believing the only way the Carolina Panthers find their Qb of the future is trading a Kings Ransom for a top 5 pick. You're just being delusional at this point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

What's narrow minded is you people believing the only way the Carolina Panthers find their Qb of the future is trading a Kings Ransom for a top 5 pick. You're just being delusional at this point

every single awful and embarrassing post you've made in this thread has been, and every attempt you've made at filtering data or intentionally omitting certain truths (ala the reigning super bowl champions moving up to secure a QB they like) is plainly visible to everything here, even if you think we're looking to you as some generous savant imparting to us, in your words, "all the information we need."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

every single awful and embarrassing post you've made in this thread has been, and every attempt you've made at filtering data or intentionally omitting certain truths (ala the reigning super bowl champions moving up to secure a QB they like) is plainly visible to everything here, even if you think we're looking to you as some generous savant imparting to us, in your words, "all the information we need."

Whatever you say bud! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

@Montsta

This is one of those people that actually wanted Carolina to beat Washington for a “winning culture.” 

You have way to many alts in here chuck and they need to be eradicated and limit you to one. I didn't want Panthers to win for one and I'm not from the losing culture you were spawned from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...