Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prime Tom Brady or Prime Aaron Rodgers - Who would you want?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Give him the weapons some of these guys had, and I'll take Marino and whip all your asses!

I will say this though: Brady's weapons weren't all-world. 

Marino was damn good.

He could make a decision in a fraction of a second and put the ball in the exact right spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TSLA said:

Are you going to ban me because I don’t agree with you just so you can sleep at night?  Like I said, good night dude.

The reason why everyone knows it's you every time you crawl back is because you immediately go back to your same old BS. Post stupid poo, insinuate everyone else is stupid for not agreeing with your stupid poo, then cry foul.

Good night indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TSLA said:

Not funny to the guys who know football. 

I know football, and I find it very funny.

Wilson is a good quarterback, but he's not Aaron Rodgers good.

The only guy in the league right now that I could see placing over Aaron Rodgers is maybe Patrick Mahomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prime Rodgers for the following reasons:

  • Brady had Belichick as his coach up until this season. Belichick is one of, if not the, greatest coaches in NFL history. I won't argue who was more important to the success of the team, but the fact that they both had each other was beneficial for everyone involved. Rodgers had Mike McCarthy up until last year. Two coaches in different stratospheres. 
  • Rodgers is the most efficient QB in NFL History. He has 412 TDs to 89 interceptions (4.6 ratio). That's INSANE. For perspective, Tom brady is the second best at efficiency at 589 TDs to 191 INTs (3.04). If Aaron Rodgers threw an interception on his next 46 consecutive passes, he would still have a better career ratio than Brady.
  • Rodgers is more mobile
  • Rodgers has a stronger arm
  • Rodgers doesn't have to deal with family drama because he doesn't talk to his. Less off field distractions.
  • Brady has a weird health cult going on

Brady is the GOAT but Rodgers is the BOAT. Brady has had more overall success because he has had the benefit of playing with one of the best coaches of all time. Rodgers has had more individual success because he has dragged his teams, coaches, and organization to wins against their will at times. Rodgers said it himself "Down years for me are career years for most quarterbacks", and he's not wrong. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Seeing Mike McCarthy in Dallas this year makes me wonder how Green Bay got anywhere with him.

Lotta people said it was Rodgers.

it was reported that towards the end of their time together Rodgers would straight up ignore the plays McCarthy was calling because he knew they were garbage and would call his own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inimicus said:

Terrell Davis would like to have a word

That comment was focused on Elways' early years, he carried the team to the playoffs/superbowl with no help. Similar to that one time LeQueen did it before he went superteam BS. AI is a better example, but in NFL, its near impossible to name someone carrying a team more than Elway for his first 10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...