Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prime Tom Brady or Prime Aaron Rodgers - Who would you want?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Jesse said:

Rodgers. Hot take: if Rodgers was in a trash division for twenty years he'd have just as many rings.

The NFC North was just about as bad as the AFC east for most years.  The Vikes have been decent, but Detroit and Chicago have most been bad during Rodgers time.  Green Bay's failures have been in the playoffs mostly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

The QB that was behind two dynasties.

"But it was BILL BELICHECK".

No, it was Tom. Bill has a fuging losing record without Tom Brady. Even John Fox and Ron Rivera have winning records. Bill is a nobody without Tom Brady

Browns record included? Bill went 10-6 with Matt Cassell starting 15 games, 7-9 with 5TDs throwing Cam and league high Convid opt-out. I dont know about pre-Tom, he replaced Drew Bledsoe. Drew was a legit QB, doubt they had much of losing record during Drew-Tom era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...